What is Joshua Swamidass talking About?

-
Joshua Swamidass is confused:

In science we have ruthlessly high standards.

All evidence to the contrary, of course.

It is part of our culture to shred arguments, because we believe that good arguments, those based correctly on evidence, will survive.

And yet so many arguments, not based on evidence, have survived.

Joshua says that science hates bad arguments and yet look at his bullshit argument for humans and chimps sharing a common ancestor- rats and mice share a common ancestor and yet they are allegedly more genetically different than chimps and humans.

That's it. That is his "argument" chimps and humans share a common ancestor-> mice a rats are more genetically different than chimps are from humans and rats and mice share a common ancestor.

Forget that rats and mice have pretty much the same body plan whereas humans and chimps do not.

He goes on to spew:

If and when ID comes up with factually sound and solid argument, using the rules of science that I know, I will be among the first to acknowledge it. They are fairly far from this at this time.

1- ID is NOT an argument for God
2- ID has factually sound and solid arguments, using the rules of science
3- Joshua is ignorant of ID and doesn't seem to understand science
4- Joshua cannot form sound and solid arguments, using the rules of science, that support any other position besides ID

I would love to take on this buffoon in an open debate.