Why Unguided Evolution is Anti-Science
Dawkins calls it blind watchmaker evolution because natural selection is blind and mindless. It does not see ahead nor does it plan. That means it is nothing more than contingent serendipity. That is nice for poetry, perhaps, but it isn't science. It isn't science because it offers up no models, no entailments and no way to test its claims. Also it cannot be measured and science mandates measurements/ quantification. No one can say how many mutations it takes to evolve a bacterial flagellum from a population that never had one. No one even knows if such a thing is possible, given the blind watchmaker.
No one can present ONE peer-reviewed paper tat explicitly states that ATP synthase arose via unguided evolution. And that is because what I said above- no models, no entailments and no hypotheses.
And to top it all off no one uses unguided evolution for anything- it is a useless heuristic.