The "Best" Evidence? Another case of Liddle's Cluelessness
The following is allegedly the most persuasive evidence for unguided evolution:
That isn't a start, it's a total failure!
The Grant's work doesn't support unguided evolution. Endler's work doesn't either. Lenski- nope. The discovery of Tiktaalik didn't have anything to do with unguided evolution. And GAs model intelligent design evolution.
Elizabeth Liddle has proven that she is a clueless equivocator. She even thinks that selection and elimination are the same process because they both have elimination and survivors.