The question is why do bacteria not succumb to genetic meltdown?
The question is why do bacteria not succumb to genetic meltdown?If you are referring to Sanford, well, that only applies in a world built by darwinian evolution and eons of time. That bacteria haven't succumb to genetic meltdown would be evidence against darwinism and eons of time.
As I told you morons before design can get around natural deterioration. You're just too set in your dogma to listen. Evolution by design does not lead to genetic meltdown.
That's the point. An easy point to grasp too. But petrushka just refuses to understand the debate and chooses willfull ignorance.