keiths, proud to be a TARD

-
Now that the game has been exposed and is over, keiths still wants to prove that he is top TARD:

C’mon, Joe, don’t give up — an entire internet audience is awaiting your floundering, expletive-laced Joexplanation of how relabeling a set of objects makes half of them vanish into thin air.

They're gone dumbass. Don't blame me for your ignorance. Anyone but an evoTARD can see half of the numbers are missing.

We also want to know what to do when Joe’s Principle of Extension to Infinity collides with Joe’s Earlier Principle of Cardinality by Mapping Function.

It doesn't collide if you can actually follow directions.

Should we apply the theory of relativity? Should we “go fuck ourselves”?

Your dick is way to small for you to fuck yourself. And I doubt you could find your ass even if you used both of your hands.

keiths also sed:

OK, Joe, here’s a pattern for you:

{1} has the same cardinality as {2}

{1,2} has the same cardinality as {2,4}

{1,2,3} has the same cardinality as {2,4,6}

{1,2,3,4} has the same cardinality as {2,4,6,8}

By using Joe’s Principle of Extension to Infinity, we can conclude that

{1,2,3,4,…} has the same cardinality as {2,4,6,8,…}.

We have thus contradicted Joe’s Earlier Principle of Cardinality by Mapping Function.

LoL! You dumbass, all you have proven is that you cannot follow directions. Nice job assface.

keiths responds:

All we did was change the labels, Joe. Nobody removed any elements, but you claim that half of them are now missing. Why?

Well now there is a double of the labeled elements. And with set theory that means the original are now removed. All of the odd numbers are gone keiths. They are not there. They have been relabeled as even numbers but the even numbers were already there and labeled.

Then keiths axes:

What directions, Joe?   

If you have to ask. You do realize that my blog posts contain the directions. Or are you saying that you are arguing against me and you don't have a clue as to what I am saying (even though I clearly stated it in several posts)?

Using my principle {1,2,3,4,...} will always have twice the cardinality as {2,4,6,8,...}.

Then keiths spews some more shit about infinity and doesn't see that he is repeating what I posted. keiths, you are a dumbass. I said infinity goes on forever. I have said that many times. And on that forever journey the train will pick up more non-negative integers than it will positive even integers- FOREVER. And he doesn't seem to understand that I am no longer talking about sets...