Intelligent Reasoning

Promoting, advancing and defending Intelligent Design via data, logic and Intelligent Reasoning and exposing the alleged theory of evolution as the nonsense it is. I also educate evotards about ID and the alleged theory of evolution one tard at a time and sometimes in groups

Friday, May 24, 2013

Is Oleg Tchernyshyov Retarded?

I have been asking who uses Cantor's idea that sets that go to infinity all have the same cardinality. The only answer I have received sed that Dembski and marks used it but that claim was never supported.

Now Oleg the asshole retard has chimed in:

MOAR set hilarity from Joe.

No one uses Cantor's concept of cardinality with respect to countably infinite sets.


In mathematics, a countable set is a set with the same cardinality* (number of elements) as some subset of the set of natural numbers. A set that is not countable is called uncountable. The term was originated by Georg Cantor.
*As defined by Cantor, of course.

More formally,


A set S is called countable if there exists an injective function f from S to the natural numbers N = {0, 1, 2, 3, ...}.
If f is also surjective and therefore bijective (since f is already defined to be injective), then S is called countably infinite.
So, the term countably infinite was introduced by Cantor himself. It denotes a set that can be mapped bijectively onto natural numbers. That's Cantor's cardinality through and through.

Not one word on who uses it. It is as if Oleg is just a drooling retard. It is obvious that he is just upset because he cannot follow two lines heading in opposite directions.

Nice job Oleg.


Post a Comment

<< Home