Intelligent Reasoning

Promoting, advancing and defending Intelligent Design via data, logic and Intelligent Reasoning and exposing the alleged theory of evolution as the nonsense it is. I also educate evotards about ID and the alleged theory of evolution one tard at a time and sometimes in groups

Saturday, December 15, 2012

Richard T Hughes says NOT to Protect Our Children!

-
Wow! Only a little impotent faggot loser would start inventing costs in order to stop us from having police stationed at our schools to protect and serve the community's most valuable assets. And on this very blog I have Richard T Hughes doing exactly that. How low can a person be?

What is it that you have against children Richie? Did one (or more) rat you out when you tried to molest him (them)?

A room with a two-way radio, telephone and a computer. Maybe a fax machine. I'm just not seeing the extra costs Richie the molester is inventing.

posted by Joe G @ 10:48 PM  

31 Comments:

  • At 11:18 PM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    Where did I say "Not to Protect Our Children". I don't believe that at all. I'm just laughing at your imbecilic solution.

    another fine example of Joe lying.

     

  • At 11:25 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    My solution is only imbecilic to a lowlife loser such as yourself. And it is a better solution than anyone else can come up with.

    But you wouldn't understand taht because you cannot come up with a new idea nor can you solve anything.

     

  • At 11:26 PM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    Caught lying again, Joe. What a shocker!

     

  • At 11:33 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    What lie? Obvioulsy I am right. My solution is solid yet, like the child-hater that you are, you have to attack it with your ignorant spewage.

    Only a child-hater would do what you are doing, asshole.

     

  • At 11:35 PM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    Where did I say "Not to Protect Our Children", liar Joe? Oh right, I didn't. caught lying again, porn posting fatty.

     

  • At 11:38 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    That you attack my solution with your ignorant spewage supports my claim, cupcake.

    Strange that I explained taht and you just ignored it as if your ignorance is a refutation...

     

  • At 11:42 PM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    No it doesn't. There are potentially many strategies to protect children. Because I find yours idiotic doesn't mean I don't want to protect kids, and only and absolute idiot with no grasp of logic would leap to that conclusion, jizzing his pants and writing a post about it.

     

  • At 11:46 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    Yes it does. You only find my idea idiotic because you are an imbecile.

    And please name one other strategy to protect our kids at school. I dare you.

     

  • At 12:56 AM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    LOL@ Joetard:

    http://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.com/

    "As O’Donnell notes, that would mean hiring more than 132,000 police officers at a cost of 6.7 billion dollars per year."

    You tard

     

  • At 9:13 AM, Blogger Joe G said…

    LoL! Because O'Donnell, a known crackhead, sed it it must be true!

    Richie finds another imbecile so what he sez must be right!

    Pathetic

     

  • At 9:23 AM, Blogger Joe G said…

    "Hi my name is Lawrence O'Donnell and I am too fucking stupid to understand that police departments can restructure their existing force in order to cover the schools."

    You should have just posted that, cupcake moron.

     

  • At 2:38 PM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    It all shows how batshit insane you are, Joe. I'm suprised you've not been institutionalized. Maybe you have? seek help.

    http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/336390/nra-if-its-crazy-call-police-every-school-then-call-me-crazy-eliana-johnson#

     

  • At 9:25 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    No Richie, cupcake. It shows how much of an ignorant coward fuck-head you are.

    I bet it just pissed you off to hear that an organization endorsed my plan- millions of people endorse my plan.

    And it is very telling that you can't come up with a better plan.

     

  • At 11:12 PM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    I'd fully expect you to go with "
    more guns", fatty, because you clearly love guns and donuts more than children.

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/21/columbine-armed-guards_n_2347096.html

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fort_Hood_shooting

    More guns does nothing. And you are a fat idiot being played by the Republican party.

     

  • At 11:27 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    LoL! I never said anything about more guns you piece of shit liar.

    The same guns deployed strategically.

    Obviously Columbine's armed guards didn't know what to look for or how to secure their zone. We should have learned from their mistakes.

    Fort Hood? The shooting took place in a gun-free zone you moronic twit.

    Had everyone in that zone been packing that would not have happened. So thank you for making my case.

    And how am I being played seeing that I said it first? And how am I the idiot seeing tha you are a proven jack-ass liar?

    And it is very telling that you can't come up with a better plan.

    But you sure as hell can erect strawman after strawman to the best plan there is.

     

  • At 11:41 PM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    It'd be more guns in schools. Guns is schools being, logically, a necessary if not sufficient cause for "shootings in schools". Fuck me you are dense.

    Let slooks at some of the epic fail you bring so far:

    No clue about costs, or deploying people effectively.

    Fort hood: "Fort Hood? The shooting took place in a gun-free zone you moronic twit.

    Had everyone in that zone been packing that would not have happened. So thank you for making my case."

    - what actually happened: "Base civilian police Sergeant Kimberly Munley, who had rushed to the scene in her patrol car, encountered Hasan in the area outside the Soldier Readiness Processing Center.[32] Hasan fired at Munley, who exchanged shots with him using her 9mm M9 pistol. Munley's hand was hit by shrapnel when one of Hasan's bullets struck a nearby rain gutter, and then two bullets struck Munley: the first bullet hit her thigh, and the second hit her knee.[19][29] As she began to fall from the first bullet, the second bullet struck her femur, shattering it and knocking her to the ground.[19][29] Hasan then walked up to Munley and kicked her pistol out of reach.[33]"

    Police get shot, shooter keeps going. And what about columbine, Dipshit?

    Fuck me you are stupid.

    Also, its not an entailment that because the head of an organizsation says something, the membership agrees with him. More logic fail from fattytard.

     

  • At 11:52 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    What a total fucking loser you are-
    It would be more PROTECTION in schools, you twisted fuck-nut. You know using the people we pay to protect and seve us to protect and serve our most valuable assets.

    You must be the most twisted faggot ever.

    Also the police wouldn't have had to rush to the scene at Fort Hood. And Colombine the security fucked up- hopefully we have learned something you stupid fuck.

    And again just because you can imagine costs that doesn't mean they exist. And I know more about security and deploying people than you know about anything. So fuck yourself.

     

  • At 11:57 PM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    "And I know more about security and deploying people than you know about anything"


    Bwahahahahahah. And ticks on melons and Dragonflies playing. No one gives a shit about your made up walter mitty life, fridge repairman.

    More guns is simply more opportunity for shootings. BIG FAT YEC IDIOT.

     

  • At 12:01 AM, Blogger Joe G said…

    Yes Richie, we get it- you are an ignorant piece of shit clueless loser.

    Police on duty, doing their job, will prevent more school shootings than anything else that is possible. And no amount of your clueless cowardly spewage will change that.

     

  • At 12:04 AM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    "Police on duty, doing their job, will prevent more school shootings than anything else that is possible"

    That's obviously false.

    You could make everyone go through 10 sequential security checkpoints and make schools hard facilities. Not practical, but possible.

    You and logic just don't get on, do you fatty?

     

  • At 12:09 AM, Blogger Joe G said…

    That's obviously false.

    Cuz Richie the ignorant piece of shit sez so!

    You could make everyone go through 10 sequential security checkpoints and make schools hard facilities.

    Umm they ain't security checkpoints if the personel manning them ain't armed.

    So a man with concealed weapons comes up to Richie's security checkpoint. Goes through and sets off the metal detector. He then pulls out two pistols and wastes everyone there. Then he strolls down the halls shooting at whatever he wants because no one acn stop him.

    Yaeh, great idea Richie...

     

  • At 12:14 AM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    The technology exists to make them fully automated, using Millimeter wave scaning (like at airports). No people or guns required on site.

    Unlucky, Joe fail.

    Why do you love guns more than kids?

    Stick to fixing fridges, fatty.

     

  • At 9:58 AM, Blogger Joe G said…

    LoL! Airports have many people manning their security checkpoints you retarded FAILURE.

    You cannot have a security checkpoint without having security. And mm wave scanning isn't going to stop anyone.

    What an utterly ignorant little fuck you are, Richie.

    And what is the cost for putting ten machines in each and every school- ten machines that have no chance of stopping anything....

     

  • At 12:19 PM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    Fuck me your so bad at thinking and understanding. "Intelligent Reasoning" must be the most ironic blog title ever.

    " And mm wave scanning isn't going to stop anyone." - No that'll be locked bulletproof doors stopping them. Duh.

    "And what is the cost for putting ten machines.."

    HEY IDIOT. STOP. We're talking about your idiotic claim that "Police on duty, doing their job, will prevent more school shootings than anything else that is possible" -

    Of course logical to know this, you'd have to know EVERY POSSIBLE deterrent. Just like you not getting science, so don't get logic.

    I'm clearly not advocating it: " Not practical, but possible.", simply showing you you're an idiot. But YOU CANT FOLLOW ALONG BECAUSE YOU'RE AN IDIOT.


     

  • At 12:34 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    No that'll be locked bulletproof doors stopping them.

    Holy shit! What's the cost of tis project? I am sure more than 7 billion to outfit every school with your system.

    IOW your system is not possible. Just because you, a known TARD, can imagine something that doesn't make it possible.

    So my claim still stands- police are by far the best available solution and you obviously hate little kids.

    Maybe seeing little kids die gets you off more than raping them.

     

  • At 12:39 PM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    Can you read?

    FAT IDIOT: "Holy shit! What's the cost of tis project?"

    The above post:

    "HEY IDIOT. STOP. We're talking about your idiotic claim that "Police on duty, doing their job, will prevent more school shootings than anything else that is possible" -

    Of course logical to know this, you'd have to know EVERY POSSIBLE deterrent. Just like you not getting science, so don't get logic.

    I'm clearly not advocating it: " Not practical, but possible.", simply showing you you're an idiot. But YOU CANT FOLLOW ALONG BECAUSE YOU'RE AN IDIOT."

    I'm not advocating it, nor addressing it's incredible expense. I'm showing you to be the fool you are for saying "Police on duty, doing their job, will prevent more school shootings than anything else that is possible"

    You are so fucking stupid you shouldn't own guns, for your own safety.

     

  • At 12:43 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    Hey dumbass, if it is cost prohibitive then it is not possible- CAN'T YOU READ:

    IOW your system is not possible. Just because you, a known TARD, can imagine something that doesn't make it possible.

    So my claim still stands- police are by far the best available solution and you obviously hate little kids.

    Maybe seeing little kids die gets you off more than raping them.

    SO FUCK YOU ASSHOLE

     

  • At 12:44 PM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    "Holy shit! What's the cost of tis project? I am sure more than 7 billion to outfit every school with your system.

    IOW your system is not possible."

    Are you seriously suggesting it's beyond the capabilities of the USA to do this?

    Oh right I forgot you're a fridge repair man who doesn't understand anything.

     

  • At 12:47 PM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    Joe Gallien, internet tard believes its not possible to put scanners and bulletproof doors in schools.

    As someone much smarter noted: It's "Not practical, but possible"

    Words. something else fat Joetard doesn't get.

     

  • At 12:53 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    Yes, it is COST PROHIBITIVE.

    You would have to have so many of these systems at each school so that students could get through to go to classes.

    Holy shit a shooter would just love to see long lines of students waiting to get into the school.

    YOU are a moron

    I have done airport security. We were working on a "tunnel of truth"- something that would be similar to "Total Recall"- people just walk down a hallway and get scanned. But you still need people to man the stations.

    Also automatic lockdown was an issue a few years ago. We toyed with a trap-door to a room to segregate the suspect. If he/ she had a bomb and was locked-down inside of the scanning system, that system would be turned into shrapnel.

     

  • At 4:21 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    Hey Richie, do your imagined systems even exist? Have they been deployed?

    If not, I would say it is not possible to install systems that don't exist into schools.

     

Post a Comment

<< Home