Archaeology, Forensics, SETI and Intelligent Design- Revisited
For years I have been saying that Intelligent Design is as scientific an enterprise as archaeology, forensic science and SETI. All rely on our ability to understand cause and effect relationships in order to differentiate between what nature, operating freely can do and what takes agency involvement to accomplish.
Easy to understand yet some people, re evotards, just refuse to grasp the concept. They will say that archaeology and forensics we already know who the designer is, which is total bullshit, or that those enterprises strive to identify the designer whereas ID does not. More bullshit as the way archaeologists and forensic scientists do that is by studying the evidence- as I tell them-there evotards:
In the absence of direct observation or designer input, the only possible way to make any scientific determination about the designer(s) or the specific process(es) used, is by studying the design(s) and all relevant evidence.
But being scientifically illiterate chimp-wannabe's, evotards cannot grasp that. Sad, really.
OR they will want to know what we have found out about the designer so far as if that will somehow refute ID. *shrug, sigh*
So the bottom-line is Intelligent Design is based on our knowledge and experiences of cause and effect relationships in accordance with uniformitarianism.
BTW just because Intelligent Design is not about the designer, that does not prevent anyone from trying to figure out who the designer was nor how the designer operated. Those are merely separate questions from wheter or not it was designed. EvoTARDS are also too clueless to grasp tat fact.