Intelligent Reasoning

Promoting, advancing and defending Intelligent Design via data, logic and Intelligent Reasoning and exposing the alleged theory of evolution as the nonsense it is. I also educate evotards about ID and the alleged theory of evolution one tard at a time and sometimes in groups

Sunday, December 23, 2012

Richard T Hughes Blows a Load Over the Foot Hood Shooting

-
Richard T Numb-balls is at it again. This time trying to use the Foot Hood shooting as a case for the "more guns don't solve nuthin'" tard.

The problem is that the Foot Hood shooting took place in a GUN-FREE ZONE on the military base. Had everyone in that zone been packing the outcome would have been very, very different.

The asshole in Colorado movie theater shootings went to other theaters first but didn't go in because those theaters allowed people to come in carrying firearms. The theater he attacked didn't allow that.


Fight fire with fire- we can't change the world, but we can deal with it.

posted by Joe G @ 11:40 PM  

65 Comments:

  • At 11:43 PM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    IDIOT:

    "Base civilian police Sergeant Kimberly Munley, who had rushed to the scene in her patrol car, encountered Hasan in the area outside the Soldier Readiness Processing Center.[32] Hasan fired at Munley, who exchanged shots with him using her 9mm M9 pistol. Munley's hand was hit by shrapnel when one of Hasan's bullets struck a nearby rain gutter, and then two bullets struck Munley: the first bullet hit her thigh, and the second hit her knee.[19][29] As she began to fall from the first bullet, the second bullet struck her femur, shattering it and knocking her to the ground.[19][29] Hasan then walked up to Munley and kicked her pistol out of reach.[33]"

    Police had weapons, got shot.

    what's the one commonality of every shooting? Try fatty. Try really hard like when you can't opne the cookie jar..

     

  • At 11:47 PM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    Its okay Joe - you love guns more than kids. We get it.

     

  • At 11:47 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    What a DUMBASS- Sergeant Kimberly Munley wouldn't have had to rush to the scene had the people in the zone been packing.

    The commonality of every shooting? People. Take away the guns and they find another weapon, moron.

    Bombs do more damage than guns.

     

  • At 11:51 PM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    I'd be laughing so hard if not for the tragedy:

    "Take away the guns and they find another weapon, moron.

    Bombs do more damage than guns."

    FACEPALM. And you can get them at wallmart, just like guns.

    You are the biggest tard. There can be none bigger.

     

  • At 11:56 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    Richie,

    You can get gasoline, put it into bottles, take gas-soaked rags stuff them into bottles and you have a nice little cocktail- most of the stuff you can get at walmart.

    Also making explosives isn't that difficult- well, for you it would be impossible.

     

  • At 11:58 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    It's OK Richie, we know that you haven't got a clue, nor a better plan, and you sure as hell don't want the kids protected, which is strange for a pediphile of your stature

     

  • At 12:00 AM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    You're at odds with reality, as always Joe.

    If bombs and associated material are so freely available and easy to make and use, why don't the malcontent use then. What's the deathcount of US Children, Bombs vs. bullets.

    You live in your own fucking fantasy lala land.

     

  • At 12:04 AM, Blogger Joe G said…

    LoL! More false accusations from the cowardly bullshitting faggot-

    How freely available is gasoline, Richie, moron?

    How about glass bottles?

    How about diesel fuel?

    How about fertilizer?

    And if you take away the guns criminals will turn to other means you ignorant dick.

     

  • At 12:05 AM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    Again, fuckwitt:

    "If bombs and associated material are so freely available and easy to make and use, why don't the malcontent use then. What's the deathcount of US Children, Bombs vs. bullets."

    Answer, dipshit.

     

  • At 12:11 AM, Blogger Joe G said…

    You are slow- take away the guns and they will find other methods to do their damage- fact of life you ignorant fuck

     

  • At 12:15 AM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    "If bombs and associated material are so freely available and easy to make and use, why don't the malcontent use them? What's the deathcount of US Children, Bombs vs. bullets?"

    Come on fatty. time to leave your lala land for a minute.

     

  • At 12:30 AM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    "2012 Empire State Building Shooting

    11 people were shot — one by the gunman, one was the gunman himself, and 9 people who were shot by the police trying to get the gunman. Yes, more guns are clearly the answer to keeping people from being hurt.
    "

    Fucking Tard.

     

  • At 9:54 AM, Blogger Joe G said…

    Many children were killed by a bomb in Oklahoma City- dipshit ignoramus.



     

  • At 10:15 AM, Blogger Joe G said…

    Bombing of America

     

  • At 12:22 PM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    IDIOT JOE:

    "On average, 1,000 bombs are created by juveniles each year.
    13 juveniles died between1992 and 1994 as a result of making a bomb.
    91 juveniles were injured in the process of making, moving or placing a bomb between 1992-1994."

    Reality

    "ttp://www.med.umich.edu/yourchild/topics/guns.htm

    The 2002 edition of Injury Facts from the National Safety Council reports the following statistics :
    In 1999, 3,385 children and youth ages 0-19 years were killed with a gun."

    QED.

     

  • At 12:28 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    LoL! Damn you are just one ignorant SoB- that link demonstrates how easy it is to create a bomb- so easy kids can do it, but Richie couldn't.

    How many children were killed by the bomb in OK City?

     

  • At 12:35 PM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    Less than 3,385 children, Joe. Removing weapons makes it harder to kill people. That's a basic fact. fat idiot fridge fixer.

    Why do you love guns more than children?

     

  • At 12:46 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    Richie, dumbass moron- you cannot remove all weapons and you definitely ain't going to remove the weapons people already own.

    The cost of doing that will be more than 7 billion.

     

  • At 12:51 PM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    " you cannot remove all weapons and you definitely ain't going to remove the weapons people already own."

    You can *reduce* them. I hope your wife does the finances because you're a retard.

    "The cost of doing that will be more than 7 billion." - maybe yes, maybe no.. but its not a perpetuity.

     

  • At 12:56 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    No Richie, cupcake- only in your little fantasy world will that happen.

    TRY to deal with REALITY

     

  • At 12:58 PM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    Also:


    "Fight fire with fire" - Right, don't use water or another means of heat & Oxygen starvation...


    "- we can't change the world, but we can deal with it" - Right, because like when as the world ever been changed, apart from all the time?

     

  • At 1:00 PM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    Are you suggesting we can't reduce weapons?

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-180650/Gun-amnesty-nets-40-000-weapons.html

    Reality, its not that shit you make up on the internet, Joe.

     

  • At 1:01 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    LoL! Go ahead, dumbass. Pour water on someone shooting a gun at you.

    And when was the world non-violent? Please do tell. Was the change from non-violent to violent documented?

     

  • At 1:04 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    And I bet every person that handed in a gun had another to take its place...

     

  • At 3:56 PM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    "And I bet every person that handed in a gun had another to take its place..." Then your an idiot who makes overly broad statements without warrant and doesn't understand logic.

    But that we knew already, fatty.

    And fight fire with fire is an idiom, imbecile.

     

  • At 4:18 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    "And I bet every person that handed in a gun had another to take its place..."

    Then your an idiot who makes overly broad statements without warrant and doesn't understand logic.

    LoL! Nice cowardly "refutation", there cupcake.

    And fight fire with fire is an idiom

    I know. YOU are the one who ate the idiom, idiot.

    And please tell us how it would be possible to install systems that don't exist into schools?

     

  • At 5:02 PM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    Bullproof doors, millemeter wave scanners and remote locks already exist, Joe. And have done for some time.

    Why do you love guns more than children, fatty?

     

  • At 7:20 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    Bullproof doors, millemeter wave scanners and remote locks already exist, Joe

    Not together as an integrated system. Having each item available does not mean they will just work together. This is NOT a movie Richie. This is tne real world.

     

  • At 9:25 PM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    Its a trivial problem, Joe. Maybe not for you, but you can only handle fridges. You bar for "possible" is that of an imbecile, which is why your argument that yours is the only *possible* solution, is that of an imbecile who loves guns more than children.

     

  • At 9:37 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    It's not a trivial problem. It has never been tested.

    So how can we install a system that doesn't exist? It ain't possible.

    Just cuz Richie can imagine something doesn't mean it is possible.

     

  • At 9:42 PM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    Again - unfounded Joeshit:

    "It's not a trivial problem. It has never been tested."

    Omnipotent JoeTard sees all, in his made up superhero fantasy world. But in reality, fridge repairman fatboy is not privy to everything.

    Why do yu love guns more than children?

     

  • At 10:39 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    LoL! Richie fucktard FAIL- everything you say is unfounded Richieshit.

    You choked on Fort Hood. You choked on the fact that bombs, including molotov cocktails, are rather easy to come by, and now you are choking on the fact that you have proposed an imagined and cost prohibitive system that wouldn't have any chance of being installed.

    Now go back to jerking off to kiddie porn you sick freak

     

  • At 11:23 PM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    Joe, try and focus your tiny mind. Stop thinking about donuts for a second.

    You blurted, like an ignoramus:

    "Police on duty, doing their job, will prevent more school shootings than anything else that is possible"

    This is patently false, as I've shown. even easier, close all the schools. This would "prevent more school shootings" than your solution. It'd create other problems, but today we're just making fun of your idiot broad-brush statements and complete inability to use logic.

    No fuck off, as you clearly love guns more than children.

     

  • At 9:53 AM, Blogger Joe G said…

    "Police on duty, doing their job, will prevent more school shootings than anything else that is possible", is still true.

    AGAIN just because you can pull shit from your ass, as usual, that does not refute what I said.

    Now go back to jerking off to kiddie porn you sick and ignorant fuck.

     

  • At 10:56 AM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    No Joe. Again, basic logic fails you.

    Without schools, there can be no shootings at schools. Its a necessary condition. Shootings then become impossible. Not so with the "Joe solution".


    You never pass up a chance to show how the most basic logic fails you. Try harder next year. Your family are embarassed. Be a better, smarter person.

     

  • At 11:18 AM, Blogger Joe G said…

    What logic, Richie?

    Please demonstrate that it is possible to close all the schools or just admit that you are an ignorant fuck.

     

  • At 11:22 AM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    You remove everyone from them, then close them. You can even level them with bulldozers if you want. Is this *possible*? Clearly yes.

    NOW FUCK OF YOU FAT IDIOT TARD WHO'S AND UTTER EMBARRASSMENT TO HIS FAMILY.

    Oh, and merry Christmas.

     

  • At 11:42 AM, Blogger Joe G said…

    LoL!

    No cupcake, asshole-

    AGAIN JUST BECAUSE YOU CAN PULL SOMETHING FROM YOUR ASS DOES NOT MEAN IT IS POSSIBLE.

    So -

    Please demonstrate that it is possible to close all the schools or just admit that you are an ignorant fuck.

     

  • At 11:42 AM, Blogger Joe G said…

    BTW, my family agrees with my solution

     

  • At 11:50 AM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    LOL@JOETARD.

    Snow days make closing schools possible, and an empirically observed reality. WHY ARE YOU SO DENSE?


    YOU ARE SUCH A FAT TARD.

    Your family don't agree with you. If they say they do, its because your a big fat wannabe bully.

    You're such an embarrassment.

    Why do you love guns more than children?

     

  • At 11:54 AM, Blogger Joe G said…

    LoL! How many snow days do schools in Florida get?

    And even with snow days the schools just re-open when the snow is cleared.

    Why do you love children so much that you jerk off to their pictures and dead bodies?

     

  • At 11:58 AM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    So we agree that schools can be, and often are closed, for many reasons. Its an observed fact. So it is possible to close them all.

    You lost this argument a long time ago with your idiotic statement. That fact you're still trying to argue something that not even you believe just shows what an angry idiot you are.

    You're such an embarrassment. Remember - your the known porn poster, Joe. You've been kicked off boards for posting porn. Proud of yourself, fatty?

    Why do you love guns more than children?

     

  • At 12:51 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    Some schools can be closed VERY TEMPORARILY.

    And that does NOT mean that all schools can just be closed indefinitely or permanently.

    You don't have an argument. All you can do is pull shit from your ass and eat it.

    Why do you love children so much that you jerk off to their pictures and dead bodies?

     

  • At 12:56 PM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    So your suggesting its a logical impossibility for a school to be closed permanently?

    Empirically false. Again, fatty porn poster, try and get your head around the concept of *possibility*. I know you're not good with concepts.

    Sorry Joe, I do none of those things. Your anger at losing another argument to me is evident, as is that you love guns more than the lives of poor defenseless children. But that is to be expected of a liar and wannabe bully like yourself.

     

  • At 1:04 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    So your suggesting its a logical impossibility for a school to be closed permanently?

    I am asking YOU to demonstrate that such a thing is possible. Until you do it is clear that it is impossible.

    YOU made the claim, support it. YOU don't just get to pull shit out of your ass and say it's possible.

    So AGAIN you don't have an argument.

    But you do like to jerk off to the dead bodies of children.

     

  • At 1:11 PM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    Its obviously possible. Schools can and are closed. There is no logical impediment to closing them all. Unless you have one? No? Good - fuck off.

    You've had a bad year, haven't you? We found that 'fatty fatty boom boom' YEC pic of you, and there went your bulling capabilities. You're just an internet joke now. This blog is a shrine to your own stupidity.

    Next year can you turn it around and be a nice, normal member of society? Do you have that degree of introspection? I hope so, for your family. They must be so ashamed.

     

  • At 3:04 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    No Richie, just because a piece of shit faggot liar can say it's possible doesn't make it so.

    And I will always have the capabilities to stand up to ignorant cowards like yourself.

    You choked on Fort Hood. You choked on the fact that bombs, including molotov cocktails, are rather easy to come by, and now you are choking on the fact that you have proposed an imagined and cost prohibitive system that wouldn't have any chance of being installed.

    And now you are choking on the closing of all schools.

    Even if we stopped educating our children they would still all be smarter than you, cupcake.

    But anyway, seeing that there are better options than closing all of the schools, it would be impossible to close them because the people would not allow it.

    IOW reality says it is not possible. But then again you and reality never were good company.

     

  • At 12:16 PM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…


    LOL@IDIOT FATTYTARD.

    >“No Richie, just because a piece of shit faggot liar can say it's possible doesn't make it so.”

    No, it being clearly possible as evidenced by empirical observation (reality) make it possible.

    >”And I will always have the capabilities to stand up to ignorant cowards like yourself.”

    Oh please, big fat internet wannabe bully. (who shit his pants when he thought I was in town). Your capabilities end at fridge repair and waffling about pyramidology.

    >”You choked on Fort Hood.”

    As Yes. Fort Hood where armed police (your solution) were shot and the gunman carried on. Thanks for bringing that up.

    >”You choked on the fact that bombs, including molotov cocktails, are rather easy to come by,”

    Please pick a year or period and show the readership death by guns vs. any or all bombs in the US. If they are so easy to use and come by, why do people so very clearly favor guns? FAT IDIOT.

    “ and now you are choking on the fact that you have proposed an imagined and cost prohibitive system that wouldn't have any chance of being installed.”

    This just highlights your inability to follow arguments. Both the scanners or closing the schools were not proffered as serious solutions, as I have mention many times and you’ve read but are choosing to ignore through dishonesty or stupidity. They were to challenge the epically stupid assertion:

    "Police on duty, doing their job, will prevent more school shootings than anything else that is possible"

    This was moronically offered without qualification or caveat. The objective is clear – to “prevent more school shootings than anything”. Closing schools and leveling them makes shooting in schools a logical impossibility, which is clearly not the case with armed police. The police could go crazy and shoot kids, even.

    >“And now you are choking on the closing of all schools.”

    No, It was offered only to show your inability to reason, as shown above. Are you stupid, dishonest or both?

    >“Even if we stopped educating our children they would still all be smarter than you, cupcake.”

    Again, try and focus, JoeTard.

    >“But anyway, seeing that there are better options than closing all of the schools, it would be impossible to close them because the people would not allow it.”

    Sigh, what an idiot. Of course it is possible. And as an aside, if you believe this is an argument, then your solution is also impossible as people won’t allow it systemically. So you’re defeated by your own illogic.

    >“IOW reality says it is not possible. But then again you and reality never were good company.”

    See above, fatty.

    It’s also worth visiting your moronic “just because you say so doesn’t make it possible” trope. If you subscribe to this, you must also apply it equally to police in schools. I await your mental contortions.

    Happy Muslim Holidays. xx

     

  • At 12:40 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    No, it being clearly possible as evidenced by empirical observation (reality) make it possible

    There isn't any such observation, you asshole liar.

    And I will always have the capabilities to stand up to ignorant cowards like yourself.”

    Oh please, big fat internet wannabe bully. (who shit his pants when he thought I was in town).

    And more lies from the faggot coward.

    Anytime Richie. Just tell me when you are in my town again and i make sure that you never leave.


    You choked on Fort Hood.”

    As Yes.

    Thanks for agreeing taht you choked- a GUN-FREE ZONE the shooter chose a GUN-FREE ZONE.

    ”You choked on the fact that bombs, including molotov cocktails, are rather easy to come by,”


    And you are still choking on it.

    Both the scanners or closing the schools were not proffered as serious solutions,

    LoL! Neither are solutions- only a moron would think that those are solutions.

    So Richie thinks it is possible to install a system that doesn't exist into schools that do exist.

    And Richie, just on his say-so, sez it is possible to close all of the schools.

    "IT'S POSSIBLE CUZ I SAY SO"

    No Richie, just cuz you, a total fucking loser can say-so, that does not mean it is possible.

    That said we have had PLENTY of school closings due to BOMB scares. But we would never close all the in the country and level them just to stop school shootings- so it ain't possible Richie.

    The only possible solution that exists right now is police presence in schools. And seeing that they are already paid to protect and serve they would just be doing their job.

    But Richie would rather jerk-off to bullet-ridden childrens' dead bodies.

     

  • At 12:46 PM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    You've just gone off an a little rant. Try to focus, fatty:

    Fort hood - cops shot, Killer continued

    Molotov cocktails - Death statisics (Us) vs. guns please, for this 'easy to use and procure weapon.'

    Pants crappy parkinglot Joe, you know your history ;-)

    IDIOT "The only possible solution that exists right now is police presence in schools"

    Same Idiot - but it's not spoobible because people wont allow it.

    *only possible* is a universal truth claim. Which defies logic. But you are an utter idiot. To show it's the *only possible*, please list all the other solutions.

    FUCKING FAT COWARD TARD.

     

  • At 1:30 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    Fort Hood - NO GUN ZONE, KILLER HAD A GUN, NO ARMED POLICE PRESENCE. POLICE HAD TO RUSH IN AS OPPOSED TO BEING THERE, READY.

    Molotov cocktails TO REPLACE GUNS ONCE GUNS ARE NO LONGER ERADILY AVAILABLE- DUMBASS STUPID FUCK RICHIE SWATTING AT FLIES AGAIN

    And people will allow police in schools- they don't have a choice, public schools. True, private schoools don't have to allow them but public schools have to follow the law.

    And yes Richie, we all know your history of lies, false accusations and cowardice. And it is very telling that you can't reference your imagined scenrio...

     

  • At 1:34 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    Public schools = public property = police can come and go as they please. It's the law.

    That is the beauty of the plan, we don't have to change any existing laws. We just have to redistribute the existing force.

    With your anal "solutions" there would have to be a change in existing laws.

     

  • At 2:13 PM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    Sorry Joetard, not possible per your 'definition' of possible (people wont allow it). So fuck off you fat coward.

    Also, No gun zone <> no armed police, idiot. Law enforcement and security personnel are authorized to carry weapons consistent with their duties by field grade officers-- or the civilian equivalent--of GS-12 or higher.

    Read more: Gun Laws at Military Installations | eHow.com http://www.ehow.com/list_7166427_gun-laws-military-installations.html#ixzz2GBe2ZeaV

    Keep memorializing your stupidity, hatred of children, illogic and cowardice. Hope next year is made as funny as you as this one: Falling over your own lies, more fat pictures etc.

     

  • At 2:24 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    Yes, Richie, YOU are sorry. As I said people do NOT have a say on whether or not police can go into schools. The LAW allows it. IOW "per my definition" doesn't even come into play, dumbass pediphile.

    THERE WEREN'T ANY ARMED POLICE PRESENT AT THE FORT HOOD SHOOTING. THERE WEREN'T ANY ARMED OFFICERS TO PROTECT THE UNARMED PEOPLE.

    Had there been the shooter would have been taken down very easily.

    And yes Richie, we all know your history of lies, false accusations and cowardice. And it is very telling that you can't reference your imagined scenrio...

     

  • At 2:28 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    RichTARD FAIL:
    not possible per your 'definition' of possible (people wont allow it).

    People don't have a say. The LAW already allows it.

    Public schools = public property = police can come and go as they please. It's the law.

     

  • At 2:29 PM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    Joe can't think.

    1: As I said people do NOT have a say on whether or not police can go into schools. The LAW allows it. IOW "per my definition" doesn't even come into play

    or

    As I said people do NOT have a say on whether schools can close. The LAW allows it. IOW "per my definition" doesn't even come into play

    Whoops.

    THERE WEREN'T ANY ARMED POLICE PRESENT AT THE FORT HOOD SHOOTING

    There were armed police on base, who got shot. FACT Joefail.

    Poor moronic Joe. So utterly destroyed, and he loves guns more than children. What a cunt!

     

  • At 2:35 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    As I said people do NOT have a say on whether schools can close.

    There isn't any law that allows all schools to be closed to prevent any more school shootings.

    You lose, loser.

    THERE WEREN'T ANY ARMED POLICE PRESENT AT THE FORT HOOD SHOOTING

    There were armed police on base,

    That came rushing in unprepared. IOW it has NOTHING to do with my solution. It is a strawman.

    Little fag pediphile Richie. Still suffering from syphillis caused by fucking aborted fetuses.

     

  • At 2:41 PM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    So you were wrong about the police, and you've changed it to "That came rushing in unprepared."

    As presumably they would into a classroom..

    IDIOT.

    There isn't any law that allows all schools to be closed to prevent any more school shootings.

    oh push them goalposts. The Law allows schools to be closed. This is a fact. its getting boring bitchslaping you now, fatty.

    Your meltdown is funny. I heard your kids asked Santa for the best gift ever: to be adopted.

     

  • At 2:55 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    No, I wasn't wrong about the police and I didn't change anything.

    And it has nothing to do with my solution. My solution would have the police stopping the shooter before entering the school.

    There isn't any law that allows all schools to be closed to prevent any more school shootings.

    oh push them goalposts

    What? That is right where the goalposts always have been. It is YOU who wants to put the posts anywhere you want. That is because you are a little lying coward.

     

  • At 3:11 PM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    Focus, Idiot.

    Its obvious that your moronic statement "Police on duty, doing their job, will prevent more school shootings than anything else that is possible" is illogical, and you're not capable of effectively employing logic.

    new addition:
    "My solution would have the police stopping the shooter before entering the school."

    right, as I recall there are 3 of them, and 2 could be out on call somewhere else.

    FUCKING FAT IDIOT.

     

  • At 4:25 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    The only part that is moronic is your moronic spewage that is supposed to be some sort of response.

    And my claim pertains to REALITY, and as I said you have a great deal of difficulty with REALITY.

    But it is entertaining watching you pull imbecilic shit from your ass and act like it means something.

    There isn't any law that allows all schools to be closed to prevent any more school shootings.

    Richie's unmanned security system does NOT exist.

    YOU are a huge TARD FAIL, cupcake.

    And how did the last asshole get into the school? By breaking in through the front door. The police would be watching the front door.

     

  • At 5:25 PM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    Governemnt can close schools at will, Joe, and does - for example natural disasters.

    Reality!

    JOEFAIL!

    "And how did the last asshole get into the school? By breaking in through the front door. The police would be watching the front door."

    BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

    Because schools only have 1 point of ingress.

    Yes, Joe, "Reality!"


    FUCKTARD WHO LOVES GUNS OVER KIDS.

     

  • At 7:36 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    Governemnt can close schools at will, Joe, and does

    No, they can't and don't.

    And they sure as hell can't close schools at will to prevent some shooting that most likely will never happen.

    - for example natural disasters.

    LoL! That ain't "at will", dumbass.

    Because schools only have 1 point of ingress.

    You can make it so. And all other points of entry will be locked and alarmed.

    And if you need more points of entry then those will have police there too, duh.

     

  • At 9:17 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    OK OK so there is another possible way to protect our kids at school. And I likes it.

     

  • At 3:58 AM, Blogger rjop said…

    >FUCKTARD WHO LOVES GUNS OVER KIDS.<

    And I would say FUCKTARD who loves NUTJOBS with guns over kids. I completely agree with Joe. Schools need to cease being a soft target. We have armed guards protecting our banks, we need the same protecting our children.

    Gun control will do nothing in preventing the nuts from getting the guns, if a NUTJOB wants to massacre people and children they will find a way to do so, gun control or not, get a clue..

     

Post a Comment

<< Home