Has Natural Selection Been Refuted? The Spewage of Joe Felsenstein
Joe Felsenstein seems to think his raw spewage about natural selection and CSI means something.
I encourage people to read it and see if they see any evidence that natural selection can create CSI. What Joe does is totally mess up the concept of CSI.
Generating specified information
Evolution does not happen by deterministic or random change in a single DNA sequence, but in a population of individuals, with natural selection choosing among them. The frequencies of different alleles change. Considering natural selection in a population, we can clearly see that a law of conservation of specified information, or even a law of conservation of information, does not apply there.
Joe, if you have populations then you are starting with the very thing that needs explaining in the first place. As I said, you are clueless.
But anyway the article is a joke and does not demonstrate that natural selection can produce anything, let alone CSI.