Darwin's Strawman- Alive and Well (Unfortunately)

-
Evolutionists love to chide us for references to Charles Darwin because they say that he was so 19th century and this is the 21st. Yet it is Darwin's strawman from the 19th century that those same evolutionists are still propping up and carrying around.

What strawman is that?

The "fixity of species" strawman. That is the idea that God Created every existing species pretty much as it was in the 19th century. However educted Creationists put the level of the Created Kind at the level of Genera, and that means they accept speciation- Linnaeus, who Darwin had to have read, the founder of modern/ Linnaen taxonomy (KPCOFGS), was searching for/ trying to figure out what the Created Kinds were when he developed his system. And he is the one who said that the Created Kind was at the level of his Genus. Variation is a key element to baraminology. And this is the very variation which Darwin denied his opposition.

What's the point? Well morons like Kevin R McCarthy, the NCSE and all evos still use the variation allowed by baraminology as evidence against it. IOW they are still fighting that same 150+ year old strawman.

And the ignorant liberal media have that strawman so far up their ass they spew it at all Republicans running for office.

Unfortunately the genral public doesn't seem to care. The theory of evolution is totally meaningless to them. Well it is totally useless so it is only meaningful to the evos making money off of it.

So a biology textbook disclaimer would be to expose that strawman- don't say the theory of evolution is only a theory. Say it argues against the strawman of the fixity of species. That way all their examples of variations within populations cannot be used as evidence against some accepted position. All they will have is their dicks in the hands and their heads up their ass- well OK that will be the same.

See also Do Species Change?