Intelligent Reasoning

Promoting, advancing and defending Intelligent Design via data, logic and Intelligent Reasoning and exposing the theory of evolution as the nonsense it is. I also educate evotards about ID and the theory of evolution one tard at a time and sometimes in groups

Tuesday, December 27, 2011

New Evolutionary Disclaimer

-
A new evolutionary disclaimer is in the works and I have even notified the NCSE about it.

The disclaimer will tell students that Intelligent Design is not anti-evolution and it will provide the support for that. It will tell students that ID argues only against stochastic processes having sole dominion over evolution. And it will provide a list of resources, as well as questions to ask the biology teachers who push the theory of evolution.

What I told the NCSE is that by telling students that ID is not anti-evolution it will expose their continued lies to the contrary.

24 Comments:

  • At 11:08 AM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    Who has issued this disclaimer?

     
  • At 11:32 AM, Blogger Joe G said…

    Thank you for continuing to prove that you are an ignorant fuck.

    A new evolutionary disclaimer is in the works and I have even notified the NCSE about it.

    What part of "in the works" are you too fucking stupid to comprehend?

     
  • At 11:35 AM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    If you're notifying people about it, you must have a sense of who the author(s) are.

    Seems my comprehension is beyonds yours.

     
  • At 11:37 AM, Blogger Joe G said…

    If you're notifying people about it, you must have a sense of who the author(s) are.

    The disclaimer has not been issued. Stop moving the goal-posts you cowardly fuck.

     
  • At 11:40 AM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    Okay. WHO is GOING to issue it? Dullard.

     
  • At 11:41 AM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    You can't answer simple questions, can you fuckwit?

     
  • At 11:43 AM, Blogger Joe G said…

    RichTard,

    I have no interest in answering the questions of a proven belligerent fucktard (like you).

    So fuck off and wait for the trial, if there is one.

     
  • At 12:11 PM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    Come on Joe, it's not a secret - you've "notified the NCSE"

     
  • At 2:07 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    Yes RichTard and you know everything about this that they do.

    When I have something more to say I will say it.

     
  • At 2:08 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    BTW do you like the way I (according to you) explicity specified what I was going to say with the words "something more"?

     
  • At 2:29 PM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    hmm. According to me - "explicity specified" - where have I used the phrase?

    HUMP THAT STRAW MAN.

     
  • At 2:31 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    RichTard,

    Buy a vowel- the definition I provided uses the word "explicit". And you said your statement was a specification according to that definition. And your statement contains the word "something" as the specifier.

    But thanks for continuing to expose your ignorance.

     
  • At 10:50 AM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    Still wiating for units of specification, Joe.

    You're not very good at science, are you?

     
  • At 10:52 AM, Blogger Joe G said…

    Richie ReTardo,

    The units all depend on what it is you are specifying.

    I have already told you that but obviously you are too stupid to grasp it.

    As for science, well sure you can spell it but it is clear you don't have a clue about it.

     
  • At 10:59 AM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    The units of specification depend on what you're specifying. Hmmm.

    How about information?

    Hats?

    Eigenstates?

     
  • At 11:00 AM, Blogger Joe G said…

    Just as predicted-> Richie ReTardo gets caught, again, spewing his brand of ignorance and then becomes belligerent!

    You rock ReTardo...

     
  • At 11:06 AM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    Joe Asserts:

    "The units all depend on what it is you are specifying."

    gets called on it - and runs away from it.

    It's a common theme with you, you make these grandiose proclamations, but when pressed for examples you shit yourself. The one time you tried, you had your CAKEBOY episode and the whole internet is still laughing at that.

     
  • At 11:10 AM, Blogger Joe G said…

    Yeah, yeah Richie ReTardo. Everyone knows that you are an ignorant fuck. No need to keep proving it.

    As for the cake example, well I can support taht in a Court of law also, or with anyone with half a brain.

    Again Richie your ignorance means nothing here. But I do understand taht is all you have.

     
  • At 11:14 AM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    "As for the cake example, well I can support taht in a Court of law also"

    Oh would you, please? I'll be there! I promise.

     
  • At 11:17 AM, Blogger Joe G said…

    I will if pressed on it. And you will just have to sit there and eat it.

    Sweet...

     
  • At 11:22 AM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    "I will if pressed on it"

    what a crock.

    I COULD IF I WANTED TO BUT IM NOT REALLY BOTHERED DESPITE SPENDING MY LIFE BLOGGING ON IT AND COMMENTING ON IT WHEREVER I CAN FIND A LINK FROM KEVIN.

     
  • At 11:27 AM, Blogger Joe G said…

    Hey assface,

    I have supported it here. Just because you choked on it doesn't mean anything to me.

    And yes I will use the same support in front of a judge and jury.

     
  • At 11:29 AM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    "And yes I will use the same support in front of a judge and jury."

    Go on then.

     
  • At 11:30 AM, Blogger Joe G said…

    So you still think your ignorance means something.

    Strange, that..

     

Post a Comment

<< Home