New Evolutionary Disclaimer
-
A new evolutionary disclaimer is in the works and I have even notified the NCSE about it.
The disclaimer will tell students that Intelligent Design is not anti-evolution and it will provide the support for that. It will tell students that ID argues only against stochastic processes having sole dominion over evolution. And it will provide a list of resources, as well as questions to ask the biology teachers who push the theory of evolution.
What I told the NCSE is that by telling students that ID is not anti-evolution it will expose their continued lies to the contrary.
A new evolutionary disclaimer is in the works and I have even notified the NCSE about it.
The disclaimer will tell students that Intelligent Design is not anti-evolution and it will provide the support for that. It will tell students that ID argues only against stochastic processes having sole dominion over evolution. And it will provide a list of resources, as well as questions to ask the biology teachers who push the theory of evolution.
What I told the NCSE is that by telling students that ID is not anti-evolution it will expose their continued lies to the contrary.
posted by Joe G @ 9:24 AM
24 Comments:
At 11:08 AM,
Rich Hughes said…
Who has issued this disclaimer?
At 11:32 AM,
Joe G said…
Thank you for continuing to prove that you are an ignorant fuck.
A new evolutionary disclaimer is in the works and I have even notified the NCSE about it.
What part of "in the works" are you too fucking stupid to comprehend?
At 11:35 AM,
Rich Hughes said…
If you're notifying people about it, you must have a sense of who the author(s) are.
Seems my comprehension is beyonds yours.
At 11:37 AM,
Joe G said…
If you're notifying people about it, you must have a sense of who the author(s) are.
The disclaimer has not been issued. Stop moving the goal-posts you cowardly fuck.
At 11:40 AM,
Rich Hughes said…
Okay. WHO is GOING to issue it? Dullard.
At 11:41 AM,
Rich Hughes said…
You can't answer simple questions, can you fuckwit?
At 11:43 AM,
Joe G said…
RichTard,
I have no interest in answering the questions of a proven belligerent fucktard (like you).
So fuck off and wait for the trial, if there is one.
At 12:11 PM,
Rich Hughes said…
Come on Joe, it's not a secret - you've "notified the NCSE"
At 2:07 PM,
Joe G said…
Yes RichTard and you know everything about this that they do.
When I have something more to say I will say it.
At 2:08 PM,
Joe G said…
BTW do you like the way I (according to you) explicity specified what I was going to say with the words "something more"?
At 2:29 PM,
Rich Hughes said…
hmm. According to me - "explicity specified" - where have I used the phrase?
HUMP THAT STRAW MAN.
At 2:31 PM,
Joe G said…
RichTard,
Buy a vowel- the definition I provided uses the word "explicit". And you said your statement was a specification according to that definition. And your statement contains the word "something" as the specifier.
But thanks for continuing to expose your ignorance.
At 10:50 AM,
Rich Hughes said…
Still wiating for units of specification, Joe.
You're not very good at science, are you?
At 10:52 AM,
Joe G said…
Richie ReTardo,
The units all depend on what it is you are specifying.
I have already told you that but obviously you are too stupid to grasp it.
As for science, well sure you can spell it but it is clear you don't have a clue about it.
At 10:59 AM,
Rich Hughes said…
The units of specification depend on what you're specifying. Hmmm.
How about information?
Hats?
Eigenstates?
At 11:00 AM,
Joe G said…
Just as predicted-> Richie ReTardo gets caught, again, spewing his brand of ignorance and then becomes belligerent!
You rock ReTardo...
At 11:06 AM,
Rich Hughes said…
Joe Asserts:
"The units all depend on what it is you are specifying."
gets called on it - and runs away from it.
It's a common theme with you, you make these grandiose proclamations, but when pressed for examples you shit yourself. The one time you tried, you had your CAKEBOY episode and the whole internet is still laughing at that.
At 11:10 AM,
Joe G said…
Yeah, yeah Richie ReTardo. Everyone knows that you are an ignorant fuck. No need to keep proving it.
As for the cake example, well I can support taht in a Court of law also, or with anyone with half a brain.
Again Richie your ignorance means nothing here. But I do understand taht is all you have.
At 11:14 AM,
Rich Hughes said…
"As for the cake example, well I can support taht in a Court of law also"
Oh would you, please? I'll be there! I promise.
At 11:17 AM,
Joe G said…
I will if pressed on it. And you will just have to sit there and eat it.
Sweet...
At 11:22 AM,
Rich Hughes said…
"I will if pressed on it"
what a crock.
I COULD IF I WANTED TO BUT IM NOT REALLY BOTHERED DESPITE SPENDING MY LIFE BLOGGING ON IT AND COMMENTING ON IT WHEREVER I CAN FIND A LINK FROM KEVIN.
At 11:27 AM,
Joe G said…
Hey assface,
I have supported it here. Just because you choked on it doesn't mean anything to me.
And yes I will use the same support in front of a judge and jury.
At 11:29 AM,
Rich Hughes said…
"And yes I will use the same support in front of a judge and jury."
Go on then.
At 11:30 AM,
Joe G said…
So you still think your ignorance means something.
Strange, that..
Post a Comment
<< Home