David Kellogg- Being Unreasonable and Disrespectful

-
David Kellogg- Being Unreasonable and Disrespectful:

Joe knows more about biology than biologists.
Joe knows more about genetics than geneticists.
Joe knows more about information than information scientists.
He doesn't need to learn about biology, genetics, or information to know about them.
IOW Shut up!

Actually, an interesting question does emerges from reading Joe's ravings, namely: why does he think he has so obviously refuted standard science?

From what I can tell, Joe holds that any explanation that doesn't include a complete repetition of the origin of life with all the steps explained completely is worthless. And anybody who doesn't "understand" that is an idiot. It's a version of the argument that each knew understanding creates two new gaps, but with added profanity and bluster. However, it saves him the trouble of actually having to know what he's talking about, or of speaking to others in a civilized fashion.

Nice content-free rant-

Joe knows more about biology than biologists.

Having never made nor implied that claim, which biologists? And why would you even say that?

You do realize that both ID and Creation have their hosts of biologists.

Joe knows more about genetics than geneticists.

Having never made nor implied that claim, which geneticists? And why would you even say that?

You do realize that both ID and Creation have their hosts of geneticists.

Joe knows more about information than information scientists.

Me JoeJoe. Me information technologist. Me have decades of sperience with information. And last I checked information technology is what runs the world.

He doesn't need to learn about biology, genetics, or information to know about them.

Strange that I am learning about each, every day.

I am also learning that there are people like you who are full of bluster yet cannot muster anything beyond negative attacks.

Actually, an interesting question does emerges from reading Joe's ravings, namely: why does he think he has so obviously refuted standard science?

And even more interesting question- for me anyway- is what standard science do you think I think I am refuting?

I would say I am pretty much calling into question your claim you have science on your side. I would say it is pretty freaking clear that I have been asking for someone from your side to produce a testable hypothesis and positive evidence for your position.

Yet you choose to babble on. I can only guess that you do so in the hope people will forget that you still haven't met my challenge.

So what do you do? Throw out more bullshit and then utter a flase challenge- first the bullshit- I have already covered the challenge-

From what I can tell, Joe holds that any explanation that doesn't include a complete repetition of the origin of life with all the steps explained completely is worthless.

David, you don't have anything. Your whole position is "anything but design, no matter what."

If you had something to support your position that would be different- we would have something to discuss.

After that raw spewage he comes here as if nothing happened.

I bet David farts in elevators when others are in them and acts as if all is well...