Intelligent Reasoning

Promoting, advancing and defending Intelligent Design via data, logic and Intelligent Reasoning and exposing the theory of evolution as the nonsense it is. I also educate evotards about ID and the theory of evolution one tard at a time and sometimes in groups

Tuesday, February 23, 2010

More peer-reviewed papers that support Intelligent Design

-
1. Deepa Nath, Ritu Dhand and Angela K. Eggleston (Editors), “Building a Cell,” Nature 463, 445 (28 January 2010); doi:10.1038/463445a.

2. Kerry Bloom and Ajit Joglekar, “Towards building a chromosome segregation machine,” Nature 463, 446-456 (28 January 2010); doi:10.1038/nature08912.

3. Timothy W. Nilsen and Brenton R. Graveley, “Expansion of the eukaryotic proteome by alternative splicing,” Nature 463, 457-463 (28 January 2010); doi:10.1038/nature08909.

4. Giorgio Scita1 and Pier Paolo Di Fiore, “The endocytotic matrix,” Nature 463, 464-473 (28 January 2010); doi:10.1038/nature08910.

5. Lena Ho and Gerald R. Crabtree, “Chromatin remodelling during development,” Nature 463, 474-484 (28 January 2010); doi:10.1038/nature08911.

6. Daniel A. Fletcher and R. Dyche Mullins, “Cell mechanics and the cytoskeleton,” Nature 463, 485-492 (28 January 2010); doi:10.1038/nature08908.

Read the commentary here

Alternative gene splicing is only explainable via design- intentional, purposeful design.

It is controlled by the software evolutionary biologists don't know exists...

27 Comments:

  • At 3:18 PM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    Creation Safaris!

     
  • At 5:45 PM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    "Creation Safaris (TM) is a ministry of Master Plan Association, a California non-profit corporation dedicated to helping young people (and adults) understand and follow God's plan for their lives, and for the whole world, as revealed in the Bible. "Fear God, and give glory to Him... and worship Him who made heaven and earth" (Revelation 14:7). "Thy will be done, on earth as it is in heaven" (Matthew 6:10). "We are His workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God [i.e., the Master] prepared beforehand [i.e., planned] that we should walk in them" ( Ephesians 2:10). "The works of the Lord are great; studied by all who have pleasure in them" (Psalm 111:2).

    "

    Cool!

     
  • At 6:13 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    Just as predicted RichTard ignores the evidence and harps on the messenger...

    Thanks for dropping in with your tard.

    I take it that it still bothers you tat you can't support your position...

     
  • At 10:49 AM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    Ah bless you, little presuppositionalist. The guys at AtBC miss you, you blew your load too soon!

     
  • At 2:24 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    Explain that to me please-

    Just how did I blow my load when all you assholes can do is lie and post bullshit?

    Also unlike the guys over on Another Tard Babbling Chicanery, I have a life- and 16" of wet snow to contend with.

    But please let me know if someone says anything of substance.

     
  • At 3:34 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    All Tards Blowing Chunks-

    That's it!

    I can start a string of threads based on what really AtBC stands for.

    After the bar closes is where accomplished tards bloviate chicanery.

    Stay tuned...

     
  • At 4:34 PM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    Joe, Davetard was hard to follow, but you've really upped your game recently. Your "CSI of cake" was as good as "Photoshopped marines praying"


    Kudos.

     
  • At 4:53 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    Hey Richtard,

    Unfortunately for you my "CSI of a cake" is spot on.

    Just because you are too retarded to understand it doesn't make it a bad example.

    Now go back to your retarded safe haven and stroke the guy to your right...

     
  • At 5:17 PM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    Safe Haven? You're the one who moderates posts (in typical creationist fashion).

    I don't quite recall, but what number of bits was the CSI of cake again?

     
  • At 7:26 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    Richtard-

    Jeffrey Shallit also moderates his comments.

    I allow everything that is relevant to be posted.

    And unlike the dishonest faggots at atbc I do not change my opponents words.

    I don't quite recall, but what number of bits was the CSI of cake again?

    As I said- just because you are too retarded the cake example doesn't mean anything to me.

    Geez asswipe I provided a valid reference to support my claim.

    And all you can do is pull out the tard in response.

    You must be very proud of yourself...

     
  • At 8:28 PM, Blogger blipey said…

    Ah yes, which has more CSI chocolate cake or white cake? Does this have anything to do with something other than there are more letters in "chocolate" than in "white"?

     
  • At 9:47 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    Ah yes, which has more CSI chocolate cake or white cake?

    How is that question even relevant?

    Do you think that either a chocolate or a white cake can arise without agency involvement?

    Are you that fucking retarded?

    Or are you also too fucking stupid to understand the concept of measuring information?

    Or are you too fucking stupid to understand teh concept that the artist imparts onformation into the art- ie the baker into the cake?

    Does this have anything to do with something other than there are more letters in "chocolate" than in "white"?

    Only to a fucking retard- which you are.

    So you no undersatndy english and have to lie to try to cover up your ignorance- well assface your lies expose your ignorance.

    Thanks you exemplify the ignorance that runs rampant in the anti-ID mob.

     
  • At 11:22 PM, Blogger blipey said…

    Why don't you work an example for us, Joe? Show the world and all those stoopid scientists what the CSI of chocolate cake is. Then compare that to the CSI of white cake.

    Or is that beyond your skills?

    Notice how JoeTard will latch onto the last sentence and forget to actually demonstrate the utility of CSI.

     
  • At 8:42 AM, Blogger Joe G said…

    Erik,

    Do you understand English, yes or no?

    If you do then explain how what you are posting has any relevance to the topic.

    If you cannot do that then just admit that you arean asshole and move on.

    Or do you think that your ignorant badgering helps you make your case?

     
  • At 8:57 AM, Blogger Joe G said…

    BTW Erik you expose your ignorance when you say ignorant things like:

    "Show the world and all those stoopid scientists what the CSI of chocolate cake is."

    That doesn't even make any sense- and the sad part is we have been over that already.

    IOW you are so wed to constant, belligerent badgering that you cannot learn anything.

    Now I understand why you are a clown- too stupid to do anythuing else...

     
  • At 5:51 PM, Blogger blipey said…

    So, what about my last comment doesn't make sense, Joe? Or is that too beyond your skeelz?

     
  • At 6:26 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    So, what about my last comment doesn't make sense, Joe?

    I don't know of anything you post that makes any sense.

    It is obvious that you don't have a clue and just come here flailing about.

    I am not interested in spoon-feeding you.

    And it is obvious that even if I did it wouldn't do any good.

    You are a cluelss dolt and apparently proud of it.

     
  • At 9:38 PM, Blogger blipey said…

    Chocolate cake. CSI? This question should be able to be answered. My question makes sense. Unless CSI is meaningless, of course :)

     
  • At 9:55 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    Chocolate cake. CSI?

    Does a chocolate cake contain CSI?

    Is that what you are trying to ask (I did go over this before)?

    This one does.

    You said this earlier:

    "Show the world and all those stoopid scientists what the CSI of chocolate cake is."

    Do you know of any scientists who think a chocolate cake can be made without CSI?

    That person would be the stooopidest scientist in the world...

     
  • At 10:44 PM, Blogger blipey said…

    Can you show me anyone who can tell us what the information content of a chocolate cake is? Anyone? Yourself included? Anyone?

     
  • At 6:41 AM, Blogger Joe G said…

    Can you show me anyone who can tell us what the information content of a chocolate cake is? Anyone? Yourself included? Anyone?

    So you are admitting that you are too stupid to figure it out for yourself.

    You are too stupid to count bits.

    What a fucking moron...

     
  • At 10:03 PM, Blogger blipey said…

    Anyone Joe. Just give me the name of one person who can tell me what the CSI of a chocolate cake is.

    Is there anyone in the world who can do this?

     
  • At 6:59 AM, Blogger Joe G said…

    Just give me the name of one person who can tell me what the CSI of a chocolate cake is.

    Again with the ignorance.

    what the CSI of a chocolate cake is

    Doesn't even make any sense.

    IOW you really are proud that you are an ignorant asshole.

    I told you how to do it Erik.

    Are you that stupid that you can't even follow directions?

    Do you think it helps your case to keep proving that you are an ignorant little faggot?

     
  • At 8:05 PM, Blogger Hawks said…

    I'm too stupid to count bits. What is the CSI of chocolate cake?

     
  • At 9:08 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

  • At 4:00 PM, Blogger Hawks said…

    Thanks, but I can't count bits. That's why I asked for someone else to do it. Like you.

     
  • At 4:04 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    If you can't count bits then there isn't anything that concerns you.

    The complex specified information of a chocolate cake is all the information that went into making it.

    That is all you need to know.

     

Post a Comment

<< Home