Intelligent Reasoning

Promoting, advancing and defending Intelligent Design via data, logic and Intelligent Reasoning and exposing the alleged theory of evolution as the nonsense it is. I also educate evotards about ID and the alleged theory of evolution one tard at a time and sometimes in groups

Monday, October 26, 2015

Moron Parents Ruining Education

I have had enough of the stupid shit said about Common Core. Now we have asswipes all up in arms about a basic math problem.

Common core requires elementary students to understand the proper mathematical definition of terms. For example with simple multiplication A x B = C, A is the multiplier and B is the multiplicand.

The issue? A student was marked wrong because they wrote 5x3 as being the equivalent of 5+5+5. The correct way to write is 3+3+3+3+3. The multiplicand is the number being multiplied.

Parents are up in arms because Common Core requires that students understand the proper use of mathematical terms.

Thursday, October 22, 2015

How We Know Biological Intelligent Design is Possible

Another ignorant argument against Intelligent Design has developed in the minds of the mentally challenged. The argument is since we cannot design organisms ID is not possible.

So how do we know the biological ID is possible? Easy, the same way we know that it was possible to build Stonehenge thousands of years ago- it exists.

How do we know someone over a thousand years ago had the capability to design and build the Antikythera Mechanism? The Antikythera Mechanism!

Biological Intelligent Design exists and that is how we know it was possible. Science 101

Wednesday, October 21, 2015

Larry Moran- Shiteating Specialist

Larry Moran has such a little dick he has to ban people that show him to be a buffoon. Smilodon's Retreat employs the same tactic.

Larry tried and failed to respond to me: (my comments are in bold, Larry's are in italics)

LoL! Explanations are meaningless without support, Larry. Even Einstein required empirical support for his scientific theory.
He also says,
Also, Larry, the design inference comes first. we do not need to ask nor answer any other questions beyond designed or not.
I suspect he is completely oblivious to the contradiction between those two statements. This is why I call them IDiots. 

One thing is for sure, if larry said that to me face I would drop him and laugh. But the sad part is there isn't any contradiction in what I said. ID has empirical support as the DESIGN has testable entailments.

The point is Larry wants to pass off just-so stories as a scientific explanation. He thinks if someone can imagine how a bacterial flagellum could evolve via drift and natural selection then that is enough. Moron.

ETA: I am able to post again on Sandwalk. How long my posts remain is another story.

Monday, October 19, 2015

Meet Zachriel

Hi, I'm Zachriel

Shouldn't post from work, Lee...

Saturday, October 17, 2015

A Liberal Cliamte Change Alarmist Changed His Mind- it was the Science

Read it for yourselves: What I Learned about Climate Change: The Science is not Settled

CO2 is not a pollutant. And we are wasting money trying to control it.


Saturday, October 10, 2015

It's Finally Here!

Technology to the rescue- Back in 2010 ten I posted Using Technology to Clean the Air. Now it appears a Canadian company with backing from Bill Gates has opened such a facility:

Canadian firm opens facility to pull carbon from air

However that would be unnecessary if we would stop clear-cutting forests and started replanting trees instead.

Saturday, October 03, 2015

Lenski's lab- Exposing the Limits of Evolution and Providing Baraminologists with Support

Yes, that is right, Lenski's long-running experiment with E. coli is piling up the evidence FOR baraminology. That is because in over 50,000 generations the bacteria are still bacteria and there aren't any new multi-protein complexes. Heck there aren't even any new proteins!

The best thing Lenski can report is that some bacteria have gained the ability to utilize citrate in an oxygen rich environment (they could already do so in an oxygen-free environment). The sad part for evos is they can't even demonstrate that the mutations that allowed for that are darwinian. That's because evos don't have a methodology for making such a determination. And that is because evos rely on bald declarations.

So yes, Lenski's experiment is proceeding just as baraminologists predicted.

Friday, October 02, 2015

Elizabeth Liddle- Still Pathetically Overselling AVIDA

Elizabeth Liddle is either very ignorant or very dishonest. She still insists that AVIDA is a good simulation of darwinian/ neo-darwinian evolution. See for yourself. However that claim has been soundly refuted in peer-review:

The effects of low-impact mutations in digital organisms

Chase W. Nelson and John C. Sanford

Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling, 2011, 8:9 | doi:10.1186/1742-4682-8-9


Background: Avida is a computer program that performs evolution experiments with digital organisms. Previous work has used the program to study the evolutionary origin of complex features, namely logic operations, but has consistently used extremely large mutational fitness effects. The present study uses Avida to better understand the role of low-impact mutations in evolution.


When mutational fitness effects were approximately 0.075 or less, no new logic operations evolved, and those that had previously evolved were lost. When fitness effects were approximately 0.2, only half of the operations evolved, reflecting a threshold for selection breakdown. In contrast, when Avida's default fitness effects were used, all operations routinely evolved to high frequencies and fitness increased by an average of 20 million in only 10,000 generations.


Avidian organisms evolve new logic operations only when mutations producing them are assigned high-impact fitness effects. Furthermore, purifying selection cannot protect operations with low-impact benefits from mutational deterioration. These results suggest that selection breaks down for low-impact mutations below a certain fitness effect, the selection threshold. Experiments using biologically relevant parameter settings show the tendency for increasing genetic load to lead to loss of biological functionality. An understanding of such genetic deterioration is relevant to human disease, and may be applicable to the control of pathogens by use of lethal mutagenesis.

Elizabeth Liddle, proud to be a dishonest ignoramus.

New evoTARDgasm- Mass Extinction Prevents Fossilization! Ghostrider the Moron

The Chicxulub impact allegedly killed off the dinosaurs. However if it did we would expect to see dinosaur fossils up to the impact layer (iridium layer), straddling that layer and right on top of that layer. Yet a sockpuppet that goes by ghostrider sez:

No dino fossils have ever been found above it. That's exactly the result you'd expect from a major rapid die-off. 
What? You would think with all the debris raining down on them the dead animals would be quickly buried and preserved for fossilization. All of the big scavengers would be gone.

This is the same moron who sez the layer on top of the iridium is millions of years old but 5" below the iridium layer is part of the impact event.