A Scientific Theory of Evolution?

 -

For many years people have been discussing whether evolution is a fact or a theory. Some people say that it is both. But is that true?

Evolution, as in a change of allele frequency over time, is definitely a fact. Heck, even young Earth Creationists accept speciation! Speciation is evolution.

However, there isn't any scientific theory of evolution that explains how the diversity of life arose. The main reason for that is because there are any naturalistic mechanisms capable of producing the diversity of life. A scientific theory of evolution is supposed to explain, scientifically, how the diversity of life arose. Yet, no one knows!

Any mechanisms pertaining to genetics cannot get the job done. Changes to genomes can only produce changes to proteins or how genes are regulated, at best. No one has ever demonstrated those changes can produce the transformations required to produce the diversity of life.

At best, evolution is a theory in a very general sense in that it has a narrative and no evidentiary support. The people pushing the claim of a scientific theory of evolution are scientifically illiterate and liars.

Shared mistakes as evidence of common ancestry?

 -

From Peaceful Science:

"Shared mistakes as evidence of common ancestry"

Really? DNA doesn't determine biological form. Meaning that DNA doesn't determine the type of organism that will develop. So, using DNA to judge relationships between organisms that are not from the same Genus, is a fool's errand.

Who would think that a mistake would remain unchanged through generations of genetic changes? Where is that prediction? 

The alleged fusion of human chromosome 2 has been alleged to be an end-to-end chromosomal fusion. That would mean thousands of base pairs of 2 telomere sequences should be found somewhere in the newly formed HC2. Do we see that? No! We see a very degenerate telomere looking sequence there. Degenerate in the form of mere hundreds of base pairs. And this happened in fewer generations than we are talking about with these alleged shared mistakes.

What claims of universal common ancestry needs, but doesn't have, are mechanisms that can account for the anatomical and physiological DIFFERENCES observed between two allegedly related species such as chimps and humans.

Shared mistakes as evidence for common ancestry is nothing more than wishful thinking and confirmation bias.

Too Funny! What a Coward!

 -

A couple days ago I challenged someone to a debate on science, biology and evolution. The response was to run to blogger and cry about harassment!

Evolutionists are the biggest cowards ever.