Joe Felsenstein- Clueless 'til the end
Fatman Joe Felsenstein has a new article Does CSI Enable Us to Detect Design?
Yes, it does Joe. However you, being a moron, don't know how to detect anything.
When Shallit and Elsberry found a hole in Dembski’s theorem, and when I pointed out that the theorem was unable to refute the effectiveness of natural selection (because its specification changed in midstream) we were right.Earth to Fat Joe Felsenstein- There isn't any evidence that natural selection can do anything, let alone create CSI. As a matter of fact natural selection requires the existence of CSI.
EVIDENCE- yours is a position that is absent of evidence. So until you actually have some, perhaps you should just keep stuffing donuts into your hole.
But whether I am right about that or not, Dembski and Marks have not provided any new argument that shows that a Designer intervenes after the population starts to evolve.No intervention required dickhead. Did Dawkins "weasel" require intervention to reach the target? Do computer prograns require intervention to do what they are designed to do?
OK so Felsenstein still doesn't have any evidence to support his trope.
Joe Felsenstein, scientifically illiterate joke