Intelligent Reasoning

Promoting, advancing and defending Intelligent Design via data, logic and Intelligent Reasoning and exposing the alleged theory of evolution as the nonsense it is. I also educate evotards about ID and the alleged theory of evolution one tard at a time and sometimes in groups

Monday, March 05, 2012

RichTARD Hughes Refues to Man-Up, Chokes on Tiktaalik

Here is the challenge (again) read the following passgae from "Your Inner Fish" and my paraphrasing of what it says. If you agree with me please say so and if you disagree then please make your case:

Let's return to our problem of how to find relatives of the first fish to walk on land. In our grouping scheme, these creatures are somewhere between the "Everythings" and the "Everythings with limbs". Map this to what we know of the rocks, and there is strong geological evidence that the period from 380 million to 365 million years ago is the critical time. The younger rocks in that range, those about 360 million years old, include diverse kinds of fossilized animals that we would recognize as amphibians or reptiles. My colleague Jenny Clark at Cambridge University and others have uncovered amphibians from rocks in Greenland that are about 365 million years old. With their necks, their ears, and their four legs, they do not look like fish. But in rocks that are about 385 million years old, we find whole fish that look like, well, fish. They have fins. conical heads, and scales; and they have no necks. Given this, it is probably no great surprise that we should focus on rocks about 375 million years old to find evidence of the transition between fish and land-living animals.- Neil Subin pages 9-10

OK man-up, if you dare- In my words- they represent the time when there were fish, and no tetrapods-> 385 mya and a time when there were fish and tetrapods-> 365 mya.

Is there anyone who thinks differently? Please make your case.

RichTARD totally avoided the challenge and referenced himself to support his claims, again.


  • At 4:47 PM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    Joe, here's why you are and always will be my bitch:

    You can't understand what the author is saying, and claim he says things he doesn't. With hindsight, the book was probably too complicated for a man of your very limited ability. Stick to stuff closer to your grade level, and that wont make you angry:

  • At 5:00 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    Rich- once again, as the fucking coward you are, you refuse to make your case.

    Strange that all you have to support your claims is you.

  • At 5:03 PM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    Case already made, Joe's idiotic ramblings debunked:

    Don't cry, Joe.

  • At 5:04 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    Yes you are a mental-case Rich- that is the only case you have made.

    RichTARD references RichTard to support his own TARD.


Post a Comment

<< Home