Intelligent Reasoning

Promoting, advancing and defending Intelligent Design via data, logic and Intelligent Reasoning and exposing the theory of evolution as the nonsense it is. I also educate evotards about ID and the theory of evolution one tard at a time and sometimes in groups

Saturday, February 18, 2012

What is Intelligent Design and What is it Challenging

-
What is Intelligent Design and What is it Challenging?- a short video featuring Stephen C. Meyer on Intelligent Design.

He also makes it clear that ID is not anti-evolution.


see also Blind and undiected chemical processes

15 Comments:

  • At 2:47 AM, Blogger The whole truth said…

    Hey joe, is your imaginary god allah artificial, or superficial, supernatural, pre-natural, post-natural, sub-natural, semi-natural, hyper-natural, ultra-natural, natural, un-natural, methodologically natural, methodologically supernatural, evolutionarily natural, evolutionarily supernatural, designedly natural, designedly supernatural, cosmic, extra cosmic, a ghost, a spirit, an alien, a machine, an angel, a demon, a magician, a goat molester, a woman beater, a child raper, or all of the above?

    Can you grasp the question, and provide an answer, joe?

     
  • At 8:40 AM, Blogger Joe G said…

    Hey TWiT,

    Is your rectum a home for your head? Is that how it evolved? Did it evolve that way via accumulations of random mutations or by design?

    As for imaginary- well that would be the "evidence" for our position, as in it is imaginary.

     
  • At 9:55 AM, Blogger Eugen said…

    Joe
    you have been TWiTed
    :)

     
  • At 10:30 AM, Blogger Joe G said…

    Now I will have to go soak in tomato juice- probably will have to burn the clothes....

    :)

     
  • At 11:56 AM, Blogger Eugen said…

    LOL
    Send TWT the bill

     
  • At 4:06 PM, Blogger The whole truth said…

    joe said:

    "As for imaginary- well that would be the "evidence" for our position, as in it is imaginary."

    Thanks for admitting that, joe.

     
  • At 4:52 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    That's right- the positive evidence for our position is as imaginary as the existence of living organisms and the laws of nature.

     
  • At 12:16 AM, Blogger The whole truth said…

    Hey joe-boi, you say that living organisms violate the 2LoT. So then, are living organisms imaginary or is the 2LoT imaginary?

    Wait a second, your beliefs are imaginary. Yeah, that's the ticket.

     
  • At 7:43 AM, Blogger Joe G said…

    TWiT:
    Hey joe-boi, you say that living organisms violate the 2LoT.

    No, I don't say that you moronic asshole.

    Don't you ever get tired of posting ignorant spewage?

     
  • At 4:31 PM, Blogger The whole truth said…

    You don't say that joe? Really?

    These are your words:

    "And living organisms do violate the second law."

    http://www.uncommondescent.com/physics/why-science-cant-study-the-supernatural-a-physicists-view/comment-page-1/#comment-419590

    (comment number 74 in that thread)

     
  • At 6:57 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    Context you ignorant fuck- living organisms arising from non-living matter via blind and undirected chemical processes would violate the second law.

    Dumbass...

     
  • At 5:09 AM, Blogger The whole truth said…

    Nice try but it won't work. You said what you said.

    Are you going to explain how living organisms violate the second law of thermodynamics?

     
  • At 8:33 AM, Blogger Joe G said…

    Of course it won't work because you are too much of a moron to grasp what I said.

     
  • At 2:19 AM, Blogger Human Ape said…

    Joe G, you're a fucking idiot.

     
  • At 7:04 AM, Blogger Joe G said…

    Human Ape- you're a piece-of-shit pediphile

     

Post a Comment

<< Home