Intelligent Reasoning

Promoting, advancing and defending Intelligent Design via data, logic and Intelligent Reasoning and exposing the alleged theory of evolution as the nonsense it is. I also educate evotards about ID and the alleged theory of evolution one tard at a time and sometimes in groups

Thursday, May 05, 2011

David Kellogg Proves That He is a Clueless Tard

-
David Kellogg chimes in on the debate:

According to Joe, the whole debate is about semantics:

This is just too funny- OgreMKV has conflated "evolution" the word with the theory of evolution.

Thanks for proving that you are totally clueless. I even provided definitions of the word, not the theory. The theory is about the HOW evolution took place. The debate wasn't about that. The debate was about the word- "evolution" and its definition.

There is a huge difference between the two.


All this time we've been arguing over the definition of a word? Where's the science in that?

The science comes later dumbass. FIRST there has to be an agreement of the terms being used and that is what we are trying to sort out with this debate.

And obviously both you and OgreMKV are totally clueless.

BTW according to Richard Dawkins if biological organisms are the result of God or a designer ten we are looking at a totally different type of biology. IOW obviously it is more than semantics.

9 Comments:

  • At 9:33 AM, Blogger Thorton said…

    JoeTard said...

    The science comes later dumbass.


    That's right dumbass, which is exactly why science-free Intelligent Design Creationism only gets laughter from the real scientific community.

    Tell us the one again about how human ancestors avoided extinction during events like Chicxulub by hiding in caves with alligators and crocodiles.

     
  • At 9:57 AM, Blogger Joe G said…

    tardtard:
    That's right dumbass, which is exactly why science-free Intelligent Design Creationism only gets laughter from the real scientific community.

    Seeing that Intelligent Design Creationism exists only in the minds of the willfully ignorant, am sure it does.

    However it is interesting that the alleged "scientific community" cannot support any purely materialistic scenario.

    tardtard:
    Tell us the one again about how human ancestors avoided extinction during events like Chicxulub by hiding in caves with alligators and crocodiles.

    So you are saying that crocs and alligators hid in caves to survive/ escape ELEs?

     
  • At 10:47 AM, Blogger Thorton said…

    Questions for you Joe. They're simple questions, please stop cowardly avoiding them.

    How old does science think the Earth is?

    How old do you think the Earth is Joe?

    When does science think the KT boundary layer was deposited?

    When do you think the KT boundary layer was deposited Joe?

    How old does science think the oldest fossils of multi-cellular life are?

    How old do you think the oldest fossils of multi-cellular life are Joe?

     
  • At 10:51 AM, Blogger Joe G said…

    And speaking of cowardly avoiding answering questions:


    1- How can we test the premise that the bacterial flagellum evolved in a population that never had one via an accumulation of genetic accidents?

    2- How can we test the premise that fish evolved into land animals via an accumulation of genetic accidents?

    3- How can we test the premise that reptiles evolved into mammals via an accumulation of genetic accidents?

    And what is the testable hypothesis for the formation of the earth?

    When does rad decay start?


    Still waiting...

     
  • At 10:53 AM, Blogger Joe G said…

    tardtard:
    How old does science think the Earth is?

    Science doesn't think and obviously neither do you.

     
  • At 10:58 AM, Blogger Thorton said…

    Here Joe, I'll even provide the science answers for you

    How old does science think the Earth is?
    4.55 billion years

    How old do you think the Earth is Joe?

    When does science think the KT boundary layer was deposited?
    65.5 million years ago

    When do you think the KT boundary layer was deposited Joe?

    How old does science think the oldest fossils of multi-cellular life are?
    approx. 1.2 billion years

    How old do you think the oldest fossils of multi-cellular life are Joe?

    Why are so do loathe to answer such simple questions about your beliefs?

     
  • At 11:21 AM, Blogger Joe G said…

    Why are so do loathe to answer such simple questions about YOUR beliefs?:

    1- How can we test the premise that the bacterial flagellum evolved in a population that never had one via an accumulation of genetic accidents?

    2- How can we test the premise that fish evolved into land animals via an accumulation of genetic accidents?

    3- How can we test the premise that reptiles evolved into mammals via an accumulation of genetic accidents?

    And what is the testable hypothesis for the formation of the earth?

    When does rad decay start?


    Still waiting...


    Until you answer those questions don't bother asking anything of me.

     
  • At 12:02 PM, Blogger OM said…

    Joe,
    When does rad decay start?

    When does it start, according to you?

     
  • At 1:17 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    When does rad decay start?

    OM:
    When does it start, according to you?

    Just as I told you before- you know when you started a blog about me.

     

Post a Comment

<< Home