Intelligent Reasoning

Promoting, advancing and defending Intelligent Design via data, logic and Intelligent Reasoning and exposing the alleged theory of evolution as the nonsense it is. I also educate evotards about ID and the alleged theory of evolution one tard at a time and sometimes in groups

Tuesday, March 09, 2010

Alan Fox- "Science" via bald declaration

-
Alan Fox is a funny dude. He is another one that will just say anything as if it supports his position.

Well Alan is over on Mike Gene's blog running his mouth at full throttle:

Alan Fox:
I mean by Occam’s razor that ToE is a more parsimonious explanation than an alternative such as front loading, because natural selection predicts design by the environment resulting in matching organism to niche.


Just how is multiple just-so genetic accidents more parsimonious than ONE design?

Alan doesn't say.

Alan also thinks that natural selection can design- again without any evidence.

So how does Alan end his post? With a projection, of course:
IDers regularly argue ToE is wrong about X so ID wins without having to have any sort of explanatory power scientifically.


Yet all Alan and his ilk can do is throw stones at ID all the while never bringing any sort of scientific explanatory power to the table.

30 Comments:

  • At 10:08 PM, Blogger Thorton said…

    LOL! I get great amusement from reading your blog because you come up with some of the stupidest, most retarded comment ever typed on the web. Like below:

    Just how is multiple just-so genetic accidents more parsimonious than ONE design?

    Alan doesn't say.

    Alan also thinks that natural selection can design- again without any evidence.


    It's like this nitwit: random genetic variation by itself can't create things. Natural selection by itself can't create things. But the iterative process of random genetic variation filtered by environment-driven selection and used for each subsequent generation can create enormously complex things.

    That mechanism has only been known for over 150 years now, and has been observed countless times in the field and in the lab. It's the basis for a whole new industry - evolutionary algorithms used to create designs humans can't.

    Please, post more stupidity like this Joe. It's keeping the guys at ATBC in stitches!

     
  • At 6:51 AM, Blogger Joe G said…

    Thorton,

    You are an ignorant moron- that is why you think my blogs are stupid- you are a clueless dolt.

    Ya see Alan Fox said natural selection can design. That is it.

    Also there isn't any evidence that demonstrates natural selection and random genetic variation can design anything from scratch.

    And there isn't any evidence for your bald claim:

    But the iterative process of random genetic variation filtered by environment-driven selection and used for each subsequent generation can create enormously complex things.

    Ya see asshole there isn't any evidence that all mutations are random in any respect.

    Evolutionary algorithms are evidence for design- or do you think they sprang into exostence without agency involvement?

    The designs they create are due to the program written.

    Are you that fucking stupid that you didn't even know that?

    So what we have is Thorton, thinking his bald assertions can save Alan Fox's bald assertions.

    The evotard runs deep...

     
  • At 6:01 PM, Blogger blipey said…

    Joe, how is your comment anything but bald assertion? Do tell.

     
  • At 6:29 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    Joe, how is your comment anything but bald assertion?

    Which comment?

    Do tell.

     
  • At 6:42 PM, Blogger blipey said…

    your only previous comment in this thread...

    Let's examine it:

    JoeG: "You are an ignorant moron- that is why you think my blogs are stupid- you are a clueless dolt."

    Bald assertion

    JoeG: "Also there isn't any evidence that demonstrates natural selection and random genetic variation can design anything from scratch."

    Bald Assertion

    JoeG: "Ya see asshole there isn't any evidence that all mutations are random in any respect."

    bald assertion with name calling

    JoeG: "The designs they create are due to the program written."

    Assertion. Bald.

    Any ideas on how to correct this obvious oversight n you part, Joe?

     
  • At 6:47 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    You are an ignorant moron- that is why you think my blogs are stupid- you are a clueless dolt."

    Bald assertion

    Supported by the evidence- Thorton's posts.

    "Also there isn't any evidence that demonstrates natural selection and random genetic variation can design anything from scratch."

    Bald Assertion

    Then you shouldn't have any problem posting an example that demonstrates it is a bald assertion.

    I say it is based on the overwhelming lack of evidence.

    "Ya see asshole there isn't any evidence that all mutations are random in any respect."

    bald assertion with name calling

    How is it a bald assertion?

    Just your say-so doesn't mean anything.

    Also it was an observation, not name calling.

    The designs they create are due to the program written."

    Assertion. Bald.

    So now facts are "bald assertions"?

    It is funny that all you can do is claim I made bald assertions but you cannot provide any evidence to support your claims.

    IOW your claims of "bald assertrions" are bald assertions!

     
  • At 6:52 PM, Blogger blipey said…

    Supported by his posts?

    No, Joe. That is not objective. Others may see his posts as brilliant. You need to SHOW that his posts are stupid--by analyzing them, at the very least.

    I needn't post anything to defend a position that something is an assertion, Joe. An assertion is something put forward without evidence. Your statement included no evidence, therefore it is an assertion.

    JoeG: "It is funny that all you can do is claim I made bald assertions but you cannot provide any evidence to support your claims."

    My claims are supported by definition, Joe--something you should appreciate... you provided no evidence for your claims, so whether they are right or wrong, they are assertions.

     
  • At 7:09 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    You need to SHOW that his posts are stupid--by analyzing them, at the very least.

    I have done just that.

    You must be too ignorant to understand what I posted.

    Not my problem.

    As for evidence to support my claims- well that can be found just by doing the research asshole.

    It isn't my problem that you are so ignorant that you don't realize the evidence supports what I said.

    IOW blipey your ignorance doesn't mean my claims are bald assertions.

     
  • At 7:13 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    Also clownie you provided no evidence for your claims.

    And justt because you think my claims are bald assertions doesn't mean they are.

     
  • At 7:13 PM, Blogger blipey said…

    Your comments in this thread provided no analysis. They were merely assertions. Anyone can see this by simply scrolling up the page.

     
  • At 7:15 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    Your comments in this thread provided no analysis.

    I have analyzed his comments before and have even posted blog entries exposing Thorton's ignorance.

     
  • At 6:29 AM, Blogger blipey said…

    Joe. Listen. It's not just because I think so. Your comments obviously included no analysis, therefore they are assertions. Your lack of understanding of the word "assertion" is of no consequence.

    If you disagree, please point to a comment of yours upthread that provides anything other than assertions.

     
  • At 6:59 AM, Blogger Joe G said…

    No Erik,

    It is all because you think so.

    And the fact a known low-life scumbag like you is here "defending" Thorton pretty much makes my case.

    If you disagree, please point to a comment of yours upthread that provides anything other than assertions.

    My first comment.

    Ya see asshole a bald assertion is one that cannot be substantiated, not one that doesn't have the evidence with it.

    IOW once again you prove to be an ignorant faggot.

     
  • At 12:10 PM, Blogger blipey said…

    Substantiate it, Joe. Otherwise, stop claiming to have done so.

     
  • At 5:23 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    Substantiate the fact that you are a low-life scumbag?

    Your posts speak for themselves...

     
  • At 7:16 PM, Blogger blipey said…

    Is there any distance you won't travel to avoid supporting a claim you've made?

     
  • At 7:19 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    Erik,

    I think it is cute that you think I actually have to answer to YOU of all freaking people.

    I will fuck with you all day because that is all you do- fuck with people.

    And the people you don't fuck with, you stroke.

    You are a little fucking kiss-ass faggot.

    Now your little panties are in a knot.

    Yabba-dabba-do...

     
  • At 7:27 PM, Blogger blipey said…

    Joe this is very old ground. I have stated multiple times on this blog that you are not answerable to me. I'm sorry that you are unable to read.

    I'll say it in CAPS:

    JOETARD IS NOT ANSWERABLE TO BLIPEY.

    So, the next time you claim that I think you are answerable to me, we can all just assume that you're batshit insane (if it's not too late).

    So, how about discussing the substance of everyone's comments and stop concentrating on being a dipshit?

     
  • At 7:32 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    So, how about discussing the substance of everyone's comments and stop concentrating on being a dipshit?

    Exactly what I have been telling you.

    Imitation and flattery and all that...

    (your posts don't contain any substance Erik)

     
  • At 7:58 PM, Blogger blipey said…

    So you'll never again claim that I think you are answerable to me? It wonderful how you ignore the core substance of every single comment on your blog. Will you make this claim again? Yes or no.

     
  • At 8:36 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    It wonderful how you ignore the core substance of every single comment on your blog.

    What core substance?

    You never posted anything of substance.

    You can't even stay on-topic...

     
  • At 9:17 PM, Blogger blipey said…

    Will you or won't you--at any time in the future--claim that I think you are answerable to me?

    Open the window to your basement and let some air in, Joe.

     
  • At 6:58 AM, Blogger Joe G said…

    Will you or won't you keep asking me questions as if I am answerable to you?

    Pull your head out of your ass and let some air in....

     
  • At 6:06 PM, Blogger blipey said…

    Have you ever answered a question in your life, Joe?

    When you're in New Jersey or Oregon and the attendant asks you if you'd like regular or premium octane, do you tell him or do you make him guess what a 13 year old would put in their car?

     
  • At 8:03 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    Have you ever answered a question in your life, Joe?

    Yes I have.

    You just don't get it, do you?

    I am just doing to you what you do to me.

    This is what I have learned to do- use the evotard's tactics against him.

    It bothers you doesn't it?

    Cool...

     
  • At 8:06 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    BTW if a gas station attendent approached my car I would tell her what I wanted.

     
  • At 8:24 PM, Blogger blipey said…

    Interesting. I'd have thought you would say something like, "Even a 13 year old would be able to tell what kind of fuel I use, bitch!"

     
  • At 8:41 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    Yes I understand that you are a twisted and demented puss-eating maggot.

     
  • At 8:33 AM, Blogger Alan Fox said…

    Did Mike Gene ban you, Joe?

     
  • At 9:29 AM, Blogger Joe G said…

    Not that I am aware of.

    He won't let me reply to you on his blog though.

    That much I am aware of.

     

Post a Comment

<< Home