Intelligent Reasoning

Promoting, advancing and defending Intelligent Design via data, logic and Intelligent Reasoning and exposing the alleged theory of evolution as the nonsense it is. I also educate evotards about ID and the alleged theory of evolution one tard at a time and sometimes in groups

Tuesday, March 13, 2012

Elizabeth Liddle, Joe Felsenstein, and other evotards, Still Misrepresenting CSI

I tried and tried to tell them that CSI pertains to origins, but their heads are so far up their asses that they cannot understand.

I posted the following quote from "No Free Lunch" but as with several other of my correcting posts, it most likely won't be posted:

The central problem of biology is therefore not simply the origin of information but the origin of complex specified information.- page 149- the sentence starting the very next paragraph after what Joe F quoted.

Just read the stupidity- oleg thinks evolution actually selects- Elizabeth thinks that because GAs can produce SC/ CSI that means blind and undirected processes can- what is wrong with her? Someone designs something to solve a problem, it solves the problem and design had nothing to do with it?

As for Joe Felsenstein, he still refuses to understand that CSI pertains to origins and thinks if he quote-mines "No Free Lunch" he can make his case.

The funny part is each of them are proud of their ignorance...


  • At 3:08 PM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    "Like Lt. Data from Star Trek"

  • At 3:41 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    And speaking of evoTARDs...

  • At 12:27 AM, Blogger blipey said…

    Can you point out (or link to) any example of a calculation of CSI? Just so we know how to do it?

  • At 6:51 AM, Blogger Joe G said…

    Hi Eric- I gave you a link and told you how to do it.

    Again just because YOU are an ignorant fuck doesn't mean a thing to me.

  • At 10:22 AM, Blogger Joe G said…

    EriK- my bad with the "c"


Post a Comment

<< Home