Intelligent Reasoning

Promoting, advancing and defending Intelligent Design via data, logic and Intelligent Reasoning and exposing the alleged theory of evolution as the nonsense it is. I also educate evotards about ID and the alleged theory of evolution one tard at a time and sometimes in groups

Wednesday, December 28, 2011

Of Probabilities, the Design Inference, Biology and Evolution

In Of Probabilities and the Design Inference I corrected the evotard strawman pertaining to ID.

Another point touched on is that if one knows the probabilities one can use that as a tool to determine the root cause. With cards it is pretty straight-forward because you are working with a defined finite resource.

With biological evolution, rather with the origin of biological organsisms, because evolution depends on the origin (can't have it without it), we cannot say anything about any probabilities because no one can even demonstrate a feasibility.

EvoTards like to laugh at their opponents for trying but they don't understand that by even trying your opponents are being overly generous. And obvioulsy you don't deserve it.

The main problem is no one knows if a living organism is reducible to matter and energy, ie its building blocks. No math can save them. Only Father Time, Mother Nature and some still unknown mechanism.

So that is my position on probabilities and evolution and biology- they are useless because there isn't any demonstrated feasibility.

(True, evotards try to simplify a living organism by trying to muddy the water wrt the demarcation of living vs inanimate. They really think that a simple replicator that varies can vary its way right up to the diversity of living organisms observed. Then they say the odds of that happening are 1 because here we are. Question-begging 101.)


  • At 2:55 PM, Blogger Human Ape said…

    Design Inference = Magic Inference.

    Calling magic "design" doesn't make it any less childish, Mr. Tard Boy for the dead Jeebus.

  • At 2:55 PM, Blogger Human Ape said…

    You fucking idiot. Read Why Evolution is True or shut the fuck up.

  • At 4:31 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    1- I am not a christian

    2- ID is not anti-evolution and if Coyne had something to say he wiould put it through peer-review.

  • At 2:52 PM, Blogger The whole truth said…

    Why aren't you putting what you say through peer review, joe?

  • At 3:19 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    It's in peer-review, and textbooks.

  • At 12:23 PM, Blogger The whole truth said…

    As of July 2010, Coyne had written over 110 refereed scientific papers and 80 other articles, book reviews, and columns, as well as the books Why Evolution is True and Speciation (co-authored with H. Allen Orr).

    How many have you written and published, joe-boi?

    And will you direct me to where I can see your name as author or co-author in any peer reviewed paper and/or textbook?

    A list of all your speaking engagements and public debates would be interesting too.

  • At 12:28 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    Nice equivocating you fucking TWiT.

    Please present ONE of Coyne's papers that demonstrates that mutations can accumulate in such a way as to give rise to new and useful multi-protein configurations that require more than two new protein-to-protein binding sites.

    Or how about ONE paper that tells us of the mutations that allowed for humans to evolve from a knuckle-walking ancestor.


    Then shut up

  • At 12:38 PM, Blogger The whole truth said…

    joe, please present ONE of YOUR papers that demonstrates anything at all.

  • At 2:58 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    And still no evidence for teh evotard position.

    Go figure....


Post a Comment

<< Home