WHO Says to STOP Lockdowns as Primary Virus Control Method
-
That's right:
“We in the World Health Organization do not advocate lockdowns as the primary means of control of this virus,” Dr. David Nabarro said to The Spectator’s Andrew Neil. “The only time we believe a lockdown is justified is to buy you time to reorganize, regroup, rebalance your resources, protect your health workers who are exhausted, but by and large, we’d rather not do it.”
The consequences of a lockdown are more damaging:
"Just look at what’s happened to the tourism industry in the Caribbean, for example, or in the Pacific because people aren’t taking their holidays,” he said. “Look what’s happened to smallholder farmers all over the world. ... Look what’s happening to poverty levels. It seems that we may well have a doubling of world poverty by next year. We may well have at least a doubling of child malnutrition.”
And, on another note: Study says Lockdowns do NOT work :
Lockdowns have not had a big impact on coronavirus death rates around the world, scientists have claimed, and the health of nations beforehand was more important.
Dozens of countries have been forced to tell people to stay home and close shops in a bid to stop the Covid-19 pandemic since it broke out in January.
But now a study has claimed the drastic measures don't even work. They found that whether a country was locked down or not was 'not associated' with death rate.
Yup, the lockdowns were dumb. Panic makes people do stupid things.
To fight the virus all you have to do is follow the prophylaxis outlined in The EVMS Critical Care Protocol for COVID-19
That alone could have saved over half of the lives lost to COVID-19
2 Comments:
At 9:59 PM, Eugen said…
I read about this. I wonder why is WHO changing their position now. I doubt they care about poverty
At 7:28 AM, Joe G said…
Poverty does affect health.
Post a Comment
<< Home