Coded Information Processing Systems and Intelligent Design
-
Coded information processing systems. They rule biological organisms. The best known is the genetic code and all the components required to carry it out. The next to last stage involves a genetic compiler. The ribosome uses the mRNA source code and puts out the object code in the form of a polypeptide. And the ribosome can also detect errors and abort the process!
What's the point? All the laws of nature and all of the chances in the universe couldn't do it. It is beyond anything nature is capable of. But somehow we are to believe that nature did it without wanting to, without trying to and without a care. That's because nature is incapable of wanting, trying or caring. So this coded information system somehow just happened. Forget the Intelligent Designer behind the curtain.
There is a multi-million dollar award to anyone that can demonstrate nature doing such a thing:
Then there will be the Nobel Prize along with all of the fame and fortune that goes with it.
So what gives? Why does mainstream science continue to deny the obvious?
posted by Joe G @ 3:59 PM
4 Comments:
At 6:34 PM,
Champion Debater said…
Nothing but assertion but no evidence.
At 8:45 PM,
Joe G said…
The genetic code is evidence. There isn't any evidence that nature can produce coded information processing systems, like the genetic code. That is why we can dismiss the claim.
We have plenty of evidence of intelligent agencies producing coded information processing systems. So we go with what we know and dismiss what we can't event test.
At 11:39 PM,
Champion Debater said…
Thanks for you reply. Simply asserting it's evidence doesn't make it so.
All know codes we have observed come into being came from a mind within a brain, all those codes are artificial; so, the *argument* (which is not science) taken to it's logical conclusion lead us to a mind within a brain. There's no evidence of a disembodied mind. Furthermore, all scientific theories give naturalistic explanations so we should follow them as default. You're just making an argument from analogy at best or, at worse, an argument from ignorance. You found a knowledgeable gap and want to insert a disembodied mind into it. When was it tested? What's the mechanism? When was the disembodied mind mechanism observed?
At 9:35 AM,
Joe G said…
Telic processes are natural. Blind an mindless processes are incapable of producing codes, let alone from the bottom up. The ignorance is all yours. Mine is an argument from our KNOWLEDGE of cause-and-effect relationships.
I never said anything about a disembodied mind. But if that is what the evidence leads to, so be it.
If you don't like the design inference that cure your ignorance by finding a blind and mindless process that can produce coded information processing systems. You will win a Nobel Prize for your efforts. And there is also a reward of up to 10.1 million dollars.
Telic processes were the mechanism. We test them every day. And we know they are very capable of producing coe information processing systems
Post a Comment
<< Home