Design Without a Designer? Not without Evidence

-
Peaceful Science has a new thread titled Design Without a Designer?

My view is that design is design. If I see it, I should call it design. This doesn’t imply a designer. That simply doesn’t follow.

Then you need a mechanism and a way to test the claim that blind and mindless processes did it. And you don't have either of those.

Farther down we get a bullshit lie from a bullshit liar:

The point is that we know of a mechanism of design that doesn’t involve a conscious intelligent designer. That this mechanism, this blind physical process, can ultimately produce complex and functional entities and adaptations without some designing agency behind it being necessary for such an outcome.

That is pure bullshit. The reason probability arguments exist is because no one knows of a mechanism and no one knows how to test the claim.

So all these assclowns have is to bluff and equivocate.