More Lies and Delusion from our Opponents
Here is a whopper of a lie:
Given we have a model of how the solar system could form without intelligent design, and no model or evidence that it was formed by intelligent design, why don’t you accept the existing non-ID model until you obtain some evidence for yours?Given that is a big fat lie why should anyone listen to you, om? We do not have a model of how this solar system formed.
omagain also spewedd this bit of crackpottery:
Joe, now that we’ve clarified that everything that does anything is designed could you enlighten me as to why ID is not making new discoveries based on that?I don't know how you reached that imbecilic conclusion as it doesn't follow from anything anyone has said. It is not a fact as IDists say there is plenty of things that are not designed. And we have p[ointed many of those things out to you.
OM goes on to spew:
If it were not a fact you could simply point to a discovery that could only have been made under the assumption of design in biology.
That doesn't follow, asshole. Unguided evolution hasn't led to any discoveries. Unguided evolution is devoid of content and scientifically sterile.
And, Joe, If common descent is not true then I guess that means the designer has to intervene every time a branch forms.
Only an ignoramus on an agenda would say that. Enter OM. Just because universal common descent is nonsense doesn't mean that branching descent is.
Intelligent Design is open to all but purely materialistic processes and what emerges from them for explaining what we observe.
Notice no mention of why that is the case, it just *is*.LoL! That is ID's position, dumbass. It has only been explained hundreds and perhaps thousands of times.
Why is om such an ignorant fuck? Why does it think its ignorance means something?