Intelligent Reasoning

Promoting, advancing and defending Intelligent Design via data, logic and Intelligent Reasoning and exposing the alleged theory of evolution as the nonsense it is. I also educate evotards about ID and the alleged theory of evolution one tard at a time and sometimes in groups

Tuesday, May 06, 2014

Nicholass J. Matzke is Lying Again

Nick just shut up- you are an asshole. Nick spews:

The ID movement has basically been trying to pretend and gene duplication + divergence etc doesn't exist since the moment they adopted the information in DNA = ID argument in the 1980s.
It is very telling that Nick the dick doesn't provide a reference for this spewage. That is because it is a lie.

Both IDists and Creationists have known about gene duplications for decades. The argument is how was it determined that gene duplication followed by function altering mutations is a chance event. Nick sure as hell can't say.

The problem for unguided evolution doing that with duplicated genes is highlighted in Waiting for Two Mutations- there just isn't enough time to duplicate and alter all the genes evos say arose that way.

So the problems are they cannot show that gene duplications are chance events- they don't have a methodology for doing so because all they have are bald declarations. They don't have enough time to get a duplicated gene changed and integrated into the system. And unless the duplicates are in the developmental genes, it has no way to change the organism in the ways evolutionism requires.


Common design explains the appearance of duplicated genes in different types of species. We have actual experience taking parts from one machine and slightly modified it for a similar use in another. We have also taken a part and used it in different applications without modifying the part.


  • At 2:38 PM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…*DNAbyDesign.pdf

  • At 4:32 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    Did you have a point, creme-puff?

    Is there anything in that paper that sez IDists said gene duplications do not occur? No.

    You must be the most ignorant ass ever.

    Of course the existence of DNA with functional sequence complexity is evidence for ID- blind and unguided processes can't account for it and it meets the design criteria.


Post a Comment

<< Home