Intelligent Reasoning

Promoting, advancing and defending Intelligent Design via data, logic and Intelligent Reasoning and exposing the alleged theory of evolution as the nonsense it is. I also educate evotards about ID and the alleged theory of evolution one tard at a time and sometimes in groups

Wednesday, September 04, 2013

Richard T Hughes- Proudly Willfully Ignorant

-
As if that needed to be said- it is clear that all evos are proudly willfully ignorant. But anyway-

Richie Tardboy Hughes has a new post over on the septic zone:

Evolution Trounces Intelligent Design

But the post pertains to a program that runs intelligent design evolution and has nothing to do with unguided evolution.

Even Richie says so but is too stupid to grasp it:

Eureqa evolves and breeds solutions to problems using genetic structures for equations and culls bad ones based on fitness – how well the equation explains known data.

Nice own goal there dumbass...

posted by Joe G @ 1:13 PM  

13 Comments:

  • At 4:37 PM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    Poor chubs clearly doesn't understand the post. Eureqa evolves solution sets (hey, remember when you pretended to work with GAs? LOL) that are better than the best solutions from human designed methods (SVMs, regressions, neural nets etc). If your fallback is that a human had to program the software before solutions evolved then you're okay with a one time setup with no knowledge of what the outcomes could be. If that's your (unsupported) notion of ID, you're welcome to it. Viva La Evolution, Chubs.

     

  • At 9:34 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    Poor Richie doesn't understand anything. Unguided evolution doesn't solve anything- solutions are goals.

    Also your ignorance wrt ID, although amusing, is meaningless.

    And obviously you don't understand the program:

    If your fallback is that a human had to program the software before solutions evolved then you're okay with a one time setup with no knowledge of what the outcomes could be.

    There isn't any "one time setup", dumbass. Each problem requires its own setup. And AGAIN no knowledge of the outcome is required- I have been over and over this with you.

    All that is required are:

    1- You need a target-> the goal-> what it is you are trying to achieve. No need to write an algorithm if there isn't a problem to solve-


    "I wrote an algorithm"


    "What does it do?"


    "It's an algorithm, stupid."


    "How do you know when its done?"


    As the algorithm chugs along it keeps checking for any match to those specs.


    2- You need to figure out a valid starting point- those initial conditions- one way is to determine what it is minimal you can do, without any algorithm, to get as close to the target.


    3- You need the proper resources that the algorithm can use to get from starting point to the target.


    4- Then there is that algorithm or algorithms that, from the initial conditions and the provided resources, some of which can be by-products of the algorthim(s), can produce the desired solution.


    That should be it- once you do all of that and hit "go" it is hand's off for the designer(s).

    Nothing to do with the blind watchmaker.

    Viva your cowardly equivocation, cupcake...

    BTW Dr Spetner wrote about "my" version back in 1997. Others have also talked about it. IOW your ignorance runs deep.

     

  • At 9:41 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    And I never pretended to with GAs. I did work with them and wrote some.

    That is why I know that they are examples of intelligent design evolution and have nothing to do with unguided/ blind watchmaker evolution. Only dishonest losers try to use GAs and EAs as examples of unguided evolution and only little faggots think that ID is anti-evolution.

    Hey that covers all of you low-life evotards.

     

  • At 3:51 AM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    "And I never pretended to with GAs. I did work with them and wrote some."

    Yes, from the parkinglot, with the playing dragonflies.

    BWahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

    Sorry Chubs, too many lies to be credible at anything.

     

  • At 7:26 AM, Blogger Joe G said…

    Yes Richie tardboy, everyone knows that you are an ignorant coward.

    As for lies, well that is all you post.

    As for credibility, well reality supports me and refutes you, as usual. IOW it doesn't matter what I say. Anyone with an IQ over 50 can figure out that I am right.

     

  • At 4:44 PM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    Uh-huh. What language(s) did you write your GAs on, Chubs?

     

  • At 8:05 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    Umm, no one writes GAs on a language. And what does that have to do with the OP? What does that have to do with the fact that you are fucking retarded? And what does that have to do with the fact that you are ignorant?

    But anyways I used C, C++ and LISP.

    Now fuck off if you can't stay on-topic. Your attempt at a distraction is duly noted...

     

  • At 10:50 PM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    C, C++ and LISP. Well done chubs! Did you use any choo choo math?

    So, what are GAs written in, if not programming languages?

     

  • At 7:25 AM, Blogger Joe G said…

    And still more duistractions- you are a pathetic piece of shit tardboy

     

  • At 10:44 AM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    Ah yes - Liars never like to talk specifics.

     

  • At 11:06 AM, Blogger Joe G said…

    And you never do talk any specifics. Go figure...

     

  • At 4:13 PM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    So, what are GAs written in, if not programming languages?

     

  • At 8:20 AM, Blogger Joe G said…

    Umm you said on and no one writes a program on a language.

     

Post a Comment

<< Home