Has Global Warming Stopped?
-
No Global Warming for the Past 16 Years- That's right, according to the data the global temperature for the past 16 years has shown no discernable increase. So much for CO2, which has steadily increased, being the cause of global warming.
Even NASA acknowledges the sun is responsible for climate cycles.
But hey, that does not mean we are free to destroy and pollute- those are the real problems we are causing.
No Global Warming for the Past 16 Years- That's right, according to the data the global temperature for the past 16 years has shown no discernable increase. So much for CO2, which has steadily increased, being the cause of global warming.
Even NASA acknowledges the sun is responsible for climate cycles.
But hey, that does not mean we are free to destroy and pollute- those are the real problems we are causing.
posted by Joe G @ 7:20 PM
19 Comments:
At 10:07 PM,
Rich Hughes said…
So stupid:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2012/oct/16/daily-mail-global-warming-stopped-wrong
"Newspaper's claim that 'world stopped getting warmer almost 16 years ago' is simply wrong, says Met Office"
"The Skeptical Science temperature trend calculator can be used to test this question. The trend in the HadCRUT4 global surface temperature dataset since 1997 is 0.084 ± 0.152°C per decade (although we have not yet updated the HadCRUT4 data, the GISS and NCDC datasts show a similar warming trend since 1997). While the trend is not statistically significant, the central value is positive, meaning the average surface temperature has most likely warmed over this period."
At 7:21 AM,
Joe G said…
The stupidity is all YOURS:
meaning the average surface temperature has most likely warmed over this period."
"Most likely", meaning they do NOT know.
And my OP said no discernable increase and 0.084 +/- 0.152C = no discernable increase, and could even = a decrease.
Dumbass limpdick...
At 7:54 AM,
Rich Hughes said…
http://www.skepticalscience.com/pics/SkepticsvRealistsv3.gif
Idiot.
At 8:23 AM,
Joe G said…
And my OP said no discernable increase and 0.084 +/- 0.152C = no discernable increase, and could even = a decrease.
Dumbass limpdick...
And never mind the FACT that the places that record the temps are, for the most part, in urban heat zones
At 8:30 AM,
Joe G said…
Urban Warming- Where Does it Come From?
At 8:35 AM,
Joe G said…
More on Urban Heat Islands and the lies of alarmists
At 8:38 AM,
Joe G said…
Global Warming or Urban Heating?
The World has NOT Been Warming the Way the Doomsayers Have Predicted
At 9:01 AM,
Joe G said…
And my OP said no discernable increase and 0.084 +/- 0.152C = no discernable increase, and could even = a decrease.
Dumbass limpdick...
And never mind the FACT that the places that record the temps are, for the most part, in urban heat zones
Moron
At 9:02 AM,
Joe G said…
And Richie- what sez that your link's data is any good?
At 9:04 AM,
Rich Hughes said…
The OP is "Has Global Warming Stopped"
This chart:
http://www.skepticalscience.com/pics/SkepticsvRealistsv3.gif
Show's how that's a very old gambit of retards like you. Have a nice day, go post some 'tunie' on a science website, its a good coping mechanism for you.
At 9:06 AM,
Joe G said…
To recap:
My OP said no discernable increase in global temps over the past 16 years.
Richie chimes in with "The trend in the HadCRUT4 global surface temperature dataset since 1997 is 0.084 ± 0.152°C per decade" and 0.084 +/- 0.152C = no discernable increase, and could even = a decrease.
Thanks to Richie for helping me support my claim.
At 9:09 AM,
Joe G said…
Richie dumbass:
The OP is "Has Global Warming Stopped"
Nope, the OP's TITLE asks the QUESTION "Has Global Warming Stopped?". And YOU have provided the data that supports that there has been no discernable increase and there may have been a decrease.
And your chart is meaningless if it is not in a peer-reviewed journal- but that may be moot due to the Urban heat effect that ignorant faggots like you ignore.
At 9:10 AM,
Rich Hughes said…
To recap:
My OP said no discernable increase in global temps over the past 16 years.
and this chart:
http://www.skepticalscience.com/pics/SkepticsvRealistsv3.gif
Show's what a cretinous argument to take that is, especially in a post titled (ie central thesis) "Has global warming stopped"?
No fuck off, you fail again. *BITCHSLAP, FATTY*
At 9:15 AM,
Joe G said…
Umm Richie dumbass- YOU QUOTED:
The trend in the HadCRUT4 global surface temperature dataset since 1997 is 0.084 ± 0.152°C
And THAT supports my claim. I understand that you are upset but that is because you are so fucking ignorant.
At 9:17 AM,
Rich Hughes said…
Scientifically illiterate. You don't understand the graph, do you fatty? That claim can (and has) been made many times before by weaker and agenda driven minds like yours. They were wrong then like you are wrong now.
At 9:20 AM,
Joe G said…
How can I be wrong when what the scientists said supports my claim?
Is that graph in any peer-reviewed article? If not it means NOTHING.
Does the graph take urban heat effect into account? If NOT it is NOT reliable.
At 9:22 AM,
Rich Hughes said…
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAH.
"Is that graph in any peer-reviewed article? If not it means NOTHING."
Well you've just fucked ID up the ass there, haven't you dipshit!
At 9:26 AM,
Joe G said…
Hey Richie- did you notice that there isn't any climate scientists on that blog you linked to? Not even one meteorologist.
At 9:28 AM,
Joe G said…
Umm Richie, there is plenty of evidence for ID in peer-review. However there isn't any evidence supporting your position in peer-review.
IOW your ignorance is showing, again.
Post a Comment
<< Home