Intelligent Reasoning

Promoting, advancing and defending Intelligent Design via data, logic and Intelligent Reasoning and exposing the alleged theory of evolution as the nonsense it is. I also educate evotards about ID and the alleged theory of evolution one tard at a time and sometimes in groups

Thursday, July 05, 2012

RichTARD Hughes- Captain Coward and Pathological Liar, Calls Me Out!

-
BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

Richie, you aren't anyone to call out someone. You are a proven intellectual coward, liar and loser. The fact that you cannot stay on-topic proves exactly that.

I have called you out several times and you have choked each and every time.

So go play with yourself and your evoTARD stroke butties..

posted by Joe G @ 12:15 PM  

31 Comments:

  • At 12:28 PM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    Quality meltdown you're having Joe. Keep going - you'll get it all out soon. Still no code?

    Figured, Fatboy.

     

  • At 1:07 PM, Blogger The whole truth said…

    Where and in what way did Rich call you out?

     

  • At 1:46 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    Richie- quality delusion you are having. Still no clue about the topic? Figures...

    Joe- The terminology used in "genetic" algorithms is wrong and misleading. There aren't any genetics, no genomes, no genes, no chromosomes using the standard and accepted definitions of the words. IOW they are trying to be metaphors.

    Richie-
    You liar you don't understand the basics!

    Joe-
    What is your evidence? Obvioulsy I understand them well enough to know they are poor imitations for metaphors.

    Look up the words "genetics", "genome" and chromosome.

    And software enginners don't use that terminology. You won't hear them ask the retarded" genomically, what is encoded?"

    Richie then links to wikipedia, which pproves my point and sez "See!"

     

  • At 1:54 PM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    Wah wah wah. Joe is an expert but doesn't like the terminology and gets confused with the most basic phrases. He also thinks the GA lives inside the organism, not the other way 'round.

    DUH.

    You're a bluffer. Still no code? Its like CSI of CAEK all over again. No one buys your shit, bloater. Still in that parking lot?

     

  • At 1:56 PM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    Here's a different link:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_algorithm

    "In a genetic algorithm, a population of strings (called chromosomes or the genotype of the genome)..."

    Whoopsy bluffer! You're full of shit.

     

  • At 2:14 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    Richie, you ignorant fuck. Just because someone can call it "chromosomes" or "genomes" does NOT mean they really are.

    Are you really that fucking stupid?

     

  • At 2:16 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    Richie:
    Joe is an expert but doesn't like the terminology

    That terminology isn't even used by the software engineers and it is misleading.


    and gets confused with the most basic phrases.

    Liar.

    He also thinks the GA lives inside the organism,

    Double dumbass- the GAs that are inside of us are inside of organisms- fucking moron.

    Again your ignorance and inability to follow along, while entertaining, is not a refutation.

     

  • At 2:21 PM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    "That terminology isn't even used by the software engineers and it is misleading."

    http://geneticalgorithms.ai-depot.com/Tutorial/Overview.html

    Bwahahahahahahaha

    Whoopsy, know-nothing bluffer!

    "the GAs that are inside of us are inside of organisms"

    Fuck me you are so stupid. In this time you could have actually learned what GAs are. IDIOT FATTY.

     

  • At 2:24 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    That link does not support the claim that software engineers use that terminology.

    They do not ask "genomically, what is encoded?"

    Also GAs are inside of us you dumb fuck. Again do you think transcription and translation "just happen" once the right chemicals come tiogether?

    What is your evidence for that?

     

  • At 2:26 PM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    Oh I see, in teh 3 minutes between me writing the post and you replying you've concluded:

    "That link does not support the claim that software engineers use that terminology."

    "Now, before we start, I'm going to provide you with some key terms so that this article makes sense.

    Individual - Any possible solution
    Population - Group of all individuals
    Search Space - All possible solutions to the problem
    Chromosome - Blueprint for an individual
    Trait - Possible aspect of an individual
    Allele - Possible settings for a trait
    Locus - The position of a gene on the chromosome
    Genome - Collection of all chromosomes for an individual "

    Hmmm. KEY TERMS.
    Fuck off fatty.

     

  • At 2:27 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    A software engineer could know nothing about biology, not even what a genome, nor chromosome is, and still write an effective search heursitic to solve a problem.

    IOW one can write a GA without knowing anything about genetics, genomes nor chromosomes.

     

  • At 2:29 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    Richie,

    If you think that is the first time I have read that link you are sadly mistake. Well you are sad and mistaken anyway...

    BTW they are just "key terms" for that fucking article, moron

     

  • At 2:29 PM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    "A software engineer could know nothing about biology, not even what a genome, nor chromosome is, and still write an effective search heursitic to solve a problem."

    WoooHooo strawman alert!!!! Yes he could use linear programming, GBF, simulated annealing, but we're talking about GAs, fatty-dipshit.

     

  • At 2:32 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    No, it is not a strawman, dumbass.

    As I said the words "genetic", genome", "chromosome" etc are all METAPHORS and as such useless.

    A programmer could write a genetic algorithm without knowing anything about biology.

     

  • At 2:32 PM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    Awww, call the Waaaaaaaambulance!

    http://gaul.sourceforge.net/

    "The Genetic Algorithm Utility Library (or, GAUL for short) is a flexible programming library designed to aid in the development of applications that use genetic, or evolutionary, algorithms."


    "Availability of multiple chromosome genomes."

    So there's a FUCKING SOFTWARE LIBRARY USING IT, FATTY.

     

  • At 2:33 PM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    "
    A programmer could write a genetic algorithm without knowing anything about biology."

    True - but he'd probably know the very common and basic GA terminology, like GENOME.

    Go cry in your icecream, FATTY.

     

  • At 2:33 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    Yes evoTARDs will use that terminology because they actually thinks it supports their position.

     

  • At 2:35 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    A programmer could write a genetic algorithm without knowing anything about biology."

    Richie:
    True - but he'd probably know the very common and basic GA terminology, like GENOME.

    Don't need it. It is wrong and misleading.

     

  • At 2:35 PM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    Well goodness me, the 'expert' has certainly learned a lot today. BASIC GA terminology. That not all search / optimisation is GAs. That the organism is part of the GA and not vice versa.


    *Points and laughs*

     

  • At 2:37 PM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    "Don't need it. It is wrong and misleading."

    Its common, widley used and reflects that GAs are based on biological evolution. ANOTHER MASSIVE FAIL FROM JOEY CANT CODE FOR SHIT BUT EATS LIKE A CHAMP GALLIEN.

     

  • At 2:52 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    GAs are not based on biological evolution- maybe someone's idea of what biological evolution is. However the theory of evolution says that evolution does not have a goal and GAs have a goal- to solve the problem they were written to solve.

    So something is wrong.

    Now if evolution were by design then it would be correct to say GAs are based on biological evolution.

    And again, just because you can also misuse words- like "organism"- just exposes your ignorance and proves my point.

     

  • At 2:54 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    So here we have Richie, evoTARD, thinking that just because someone can call something an "organism", "genome", "chromosome", etc that means they really are those things!

    Richie obvioulsy never heard of a metaphor, even a poorly designed metaphor is still a metaphor.

     

  • At 2:55 PM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_algorithm

    "In the computer science field of artificial intelligence, a genetic algorithm (GA) is a search heuristic that mimics the process of natural evolution."

    Ever get tired of being wrong, fatty? You got caught in another lie. That's because we know you lie and lot, and your not very clever.

     

  • At 2:57 PM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    Unfortunately for you Joe, the programming community recognizes these terms as correct in computing, and fat bluffers like yourself do not, then get found out and have a good cry.

     

  • At 2:57 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    Just because someone can say it does not make it so, moron.

    As I said you will believe anything as long as you think it supports you.

    "Natural evolution" does NOT have a goal you fucking moron. GAs have a goal.

    GAs obvioulsy do not mimic natural evolution.

     

  • At 2:58 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    Unfortunately for you, you are an ignorant faggot who can't even buy a vowel...

     

  • At 3:00 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    Genetic Algorithms have a goal

     

  • At 3:00 PM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    GREAT METDOWN, JOE. BITCHSLAPING YOU IS ALWAYS FUN. NOW HAVE A GOOD CRY.

     

  • At 3:01 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    Great evoTARDgasm, Richie.

    Now go play with yourself and your buttie strokers.

    You are a legend in your own bitty mind. Keep up the delusions.

     

  • At 3:44 PM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    Still no code, Joe? *shocking!*

     

  • At 4:27 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    But anyway Richie, you stupid faggot, your tard is out of the bag for trying to get me to describe something that in your little bitty pointed head doesn't exist.

    Not only that it doesn't have anything to do with anything I have said about GAs. You are a sad dishonest tard.

     

Post a Comment

<< Home