Elizabeth Liddle (and Oleg)- Still Lying About Creating CSI
-
Geez Lizzie, I told you that you didn't create any CSI, but that is because you obvioulsy do not understand the concept. Now Lizzie is still promoting her lie that natural selection created CSI.
Unfortunately for Lizzie natural selection didn't have anything to do with what she created. Blind and undirected processes didn't have anything to do with what she created. And what she created is NOT even CSI! (by Dembski's definition)
EvoTARDs are such lying fucks and the sad part is they believe their lies.
Geez Lizzie, I told you that you didn't create any CSI, but that is because you obvioulsy do not understand the concept. Now Lizzie is still promoting her lie that natural selection created CSI.
Unfortunately for Lizzie natural selection didn't have anything to do with what she created. Blind and undirected processes didn't have anything to do with what she created. And what she created is NOT even CSI! (by Dembski's definition)
EvoTARDs are such lying fucks and the sad part is they believe their lies.
36 Comments:
At 8:29 PM, Rich Hughes said…
"
3
JoeJuly 1, 2012 at 3:25 pm
The Bible contains references to UFOs. And are you saying that eye-witness accounts are not actual evidence- even when it comes from very credible sources?"
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHahahahahHAHAHAHHHAHahahahHHAHHAHAHA
At 9:49 PM, Joe G said…
Laugh away- ignorant fools always do, and here you are.
But anyway-
the bible and ufos
and, for starters-
Newly released UFO files from the UK government
More UK UFO files
At 10:10 PM, Rich Hughes said…
Fantastic. I can see this being a popular thread. Tell us more about the bible being a "very credible source" with its "eye-witness accounts"
At 10:15 PM, Joe G said…
Truly unbelievable- you have no clue and you really think your ignorance means something.
Please explain how what I said translates into what you posted.
The Bible does contain references to UFOs and there are many credible eyewitnesses to UFOs.
So what the fuck is your ignorant problem?
At 10:17 PM, Joe G said…
Leave it to RichTARD Hughes to try to distract from the OP in the hope he can distract from the fact that his butt buddies are flagrant liars.
One known liar to the "rescue" of other known liars.
Get the popcorn ready, this should be comedy platinum...
At 10:17 PM, Rich Hughes said…
What, in your learned opinion is the best eye witness evidence for UFOs?
Which chapters and verses in the bible mention UFOs?
Thanks in advance, Chubs!
At 10:19 PM, Joe G said…
I provided the links. Obvioulsy you are too retarded to point, click and read.
No surprise there...
I see your weak-eye/ weak-mind connection is still solid
At 10:20 PM, Rich Hughes said…
"In your leaned opinion" you big fat bluffer. UFOs! Ghost Hunters! ID! Wanna buy a bridge, Porky?
At 10:22 PM, Joe G said…
Unable to read, unable to think, RichTARD has his usual evoTARDgasm.
There is more evidence for UFOs than there is for your position. I take it that bothers you
Buy a vowel weak-mind
At 10:24 PM, Rich Hughes said…
Again, you fat shit, you give no details. What a sad one trick pony you are. Of the many, 'credible' evidences for UFOs, you can't bring forth your favourite. Oh right, because that would require SUBSTANCE, something IDists must avoid at all costs.
At 10:25 PM, Joe G said…
I linked to them you ignorant fuck.
The details are at the end of the links i provided you no-dick faggot.
As for substance- you and your position lack that also.
At 10:27 PM, Rich Hughes said…
In your own words, you clueless salad-dodger, which is the best case?
Too scared to make an argument, again. Chickenshit.
At 10:28 PM, Joe G said…
So to recap-
RichTARD comes here spewing his ignorance, as usual. I provide links to support my claims. RichTARD ignores the links because RichTARD loves ignorance.
And because of RichTARD's willful ignorance he thinks I am bluffing...
At 10:31 PM, Rich Hughes said…
The fact you can really describe any of the "evidence" says it all, Joe. I'm very willing to talk specifics, its just chicken-shit Joe never brings them up. And I'll bet UFOs support BARAMINOLOGY.
Daft fuck.
At 10:34 PM, Joe G said…
Rich-
You are a clueless fuck, a coward, a liar and ignorant as can be. You don't know anything about any specifics.
This thread is not about UFOs and my claims are supported by the links I provided.
So eat shit, I am sure you are hungry
At 10:36 PM, Rich Hughes said…
"You don't know anything about any specifics."
Because you wont bring them up. Down worry Joe, you've got no credability left to lose! might as well go full TARD.
At 10:38 PM, Joe G said…
I linked to them.
Read them and comment or admit that you choose to be ignorant.
And yes, you know all about going full TARD.
At 10:43 PM, Rich Hughes said…
Oh okay, if that's your criteria, look:
evolution is true:
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=evidence+for+evolution
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=ID+is+religiously+motivated
You can move on with your life now, Chubs.
At 10:48 PM, Joe G said…
LoL! RichTARD is totally clueless- as usual.
Obviously you didn't read anything I linked to.
OTOH I know for a fact that ID doesn't have anything to do with religion and ID is not anti-evolution.
At 10:51 PM, Rich Hughes said…
LoL! JoeTARD is totally clueless- as usual.
Obviously you didn't read anything I linked to.
OTOH I know for a fact that only drooling mongs believe there's credible evidence for UFOs
At 10:53 PM, Joe G said…
Now RichTARD is just lying, as usual.
One thing is clear, there isn't any credible evidence for evolutionism...
At 10:54 PM, Rich Hughes said…
Now JoeTARD is just lying, as usual.
One thing is clear, there isn't any credible evidence for UFOs and ID...
At 10:58 PM, Joe G said…
Credible evidence for UFOs
And the credible evidence for ID is all around. RichTARD just keeps his head too far up oleg's ass to notice.
At 11:03 PM, Rich Hughes said…
Credible evidence for unicorns!
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=evidence+for+unicorns
Dipshit.
At 11:11 PM, Joe G said…
Yup there is more evidence for unicorns than there is for your position...
At 10:38 AM, The whole truth said…
"One thing is clear, there isn't any credible evidence for evolutionism"
It's interesting that you chose to use the word "evolutionism" instead of evolution. You and the other IDiots constantly condemn "evolutionists" which must mean that you and the other IDiots believe that "evolutionism" exists.
Plus, here is a definition of the word "evolutionism":
"Evolutionism, as opposed to Creationism, is the advocacy of or belief in biological evolution.[1] Therefore one who believes in or supports a theory of evolution[2] would be referred to as an evolutionist. Evolutionism, used in a general sense, encompasses any type of biological evolutionist. Broken down into two categories, "Evolutionism" and "Evolutionists" usually involve Atheistic/Agnostic Evolutionists (evolution without God) and Theistic Evolutionists (evolution with God). Those categories can be further broken down, but they are the main two."
There's more here:
http://www.conservapedia.com/Evolutionism
As even you should be able to see, "evolutionism" is not the same thing as evolution itself. Evolutionism is the acceptance, belief, or advocacy of evolution, and based on the above definition and on your own constant condemnation of "evolutionists" or what you call "evotards" there certainly is credible evidence of "evolutionism".
Wanna try again?
At 11:35 AM, Joe G said…
It's interesting that you chose to use the word "evolutionism" instead of evolution.
Why is it interesting? "Evolutionism" is the nonsensical, unsupported poistion that accumlations of random mutations produced the diversity of living organisms from some unknown population(s) of prokaryotic-like organisms, ie the current "theory" of evolution.
Using the word "evolution" is for equivocating faggots, like yourself.
But anyway I knew and understood all you posted. OTOH you are still and ignorant fuck.
And it is very telling that you cannot produce any evidence for evolutionism.
At 11:45 AM, Joe G said…
There is more evidence for UFOs and bigfoot than there is for evolutionism...
At 11:46 AM, The whole truth said…
Actually, I produced plenty of evidence for "evolutionism", and so do you every time you mention or condemn an "evolutionist" or as you usually say, an "evotard".
By the way joey, you are evidence of IDiotism, creationism, and tardism.
At 11:47 AM, Joe G said…
You are a liar. You can't even produce a testable hypothesis for evolutionism.
So fuck off.
At 11:49 AM, Joe G said…
The fact is you don't know what evidence is...
At 11:56 AM, The whole truth said…
You just provided evidence for "evolutionism" in your own statement. You described it as a "poisition", which of course should be 'position'. So, if it's a position, and you believe that the position exists, you believe that there's evidence for "evolutionism".
Maybe you should say 'there's no evidence for evolution or evidence to support the position of evolutionism', but of course you'd still be just as wrong.
Ya know, joey, if you want to play with the big boys you need to learn how to use the lingo.
At 12:09 PM, Joe G said…
You are retarded. Just because a position exists does not mean there is evidence to support it.
And obvioulsy you cannot provide any positive evidence to support evolutionism.
At 12:24 PM, Joe G said…
But I do understand that you like playing with big boys....
At 12:58 PM, The whole truth said…
You're hopeless joey.
At 1:47 PM, Joe G said…
Yeah, I'm hopeless because you are a piece-of-shit lying evoTARD.
That makes sense...
Post a Comment
<< Home