Intelligent Reasoning

Promoting, advancing and defending Intelligent Design via data, logic and Intelligent Reasoning and exposing the theory of evolution as the nonsense it is. I also educate evotards about ID and the theory of evolution one tard at a time and sometimes in groups

Wednesday, April 04, 2012

A "Sensuous Curmudgeon" or Just Another Ignorant evoTARD?

-
By looking for news for the "Coppedge vs JPL" trial I have found a gold-mine in evoTARD ignorance. There is a gossip-hound- a very ignorant gossip-hound- that goes by the "sensuous curmudgeon". You want to see someone who doesn't let the facts get in the way of a good gossip-rant, that is the person to see.

Take a look at a recent blog:

Is Barack Obama a Creationist?

Even though this person is attacking President Obama, something I don't mind, it is doing so through sheer ignorance.

Neither the term "social darwinism" nor "Darwinism" nor "Darwinist" were invented by Creationists. "Social Darwinism arose in the latter part of the 19th century and Thomas Henry Huxley coined "Darwinism".

Not only that when Creationists use "Darwinist" or "Darwinism" they do not use it as an insult. Evos still call themselves that. What would the insult be?

But anyway, this curmudgeon is a classic evoTARD- ignorant as hell and very proud of it.

3 Comments:

  • At 6:19 PM, Blogger The Bicycling Guitarist said…

    While I don't agree with all of the Sensuous Curmudgeon's political or social views, his blog is one of the best places on the internet to get accurate information on the "controversy" about evolution.

    Whether or not you choose to accept it, ALL the evidence supports evolution and none falsifies it, while NO evidence supports a young earth creationist viewpoint and much falsifies that viewpoint.

    The people who regularly comment on the Sensuous Curmudgeon's blog are very intelligent and witty. I read his blog regularly as much for the comments as for the articles, which are well written and accurate even if you don't think so.

     
  • At 10:46 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    Thanks for the laugh- That blog doesn't contain anything that is accurate- it is mostly lies.

    As for supporting "evolution"- nice equivocation. Neither ID nor YEC is anti-evolution as both accept "a change in allele frequency over time". And tehre isn't any evidence supporting the claim that natural selection is a designer mimic.

    The sensuous curmudgeon is ignorant of science and refuses to understand what the opponents of materialsim say.

    That blog is one place to go if one wants a skewed view from a deranged pyscho. Even if you don't think so...

     
  • At 9:46 AM, Blogger themayan said…

    Yes it is a laugh as the word evolution is a wildcard word (which as you rightly noted is not the issue). The real issue is the modern synthesis which infers more than just changes in allele frequency over time.

    I have several citations from at least few evolutionist themselves who are honest enough to admit that the modern evolutionary synthesis is failed paradigm. Of course they still cling to prokaryote to man evolution, but again at least they admit the modern synthesis can no longer be considered a valid theoretical framework for evolutionary biology.

    I was called dishonest by these fools at the Sensuous Curmudgeon and I was challenged to present these citations. And when I did, they did the usual and changed the goals post and or offered irrelevant straw man arguments and red herrings.

     

Post a Comment

<< Home