A "Sensuous Curmudgeon" or Just Another Ignorant evoTARD?
-
By looking for news for the "Coppedge vs JPL" trial I have found a gold-mine in evoTARD ignorance. There is a gossip-hound- a very ignorant gossip-hound- that goes by the "sensuous curmudgeon". You want to see someone who doesn't let the facts get in the way of a good gossip-rant, that is the person to see.
Take a look at a recent blog:
Is Barack Obama a Creationist?
Even though this person is attacking President Obama, something I don't mind, it is doing so through sheer ignorance.
Neither the term "social darwinism" nor "Darwinism" nor "Darwinist" were invented by Creationists. "Social Darwinism arose in the latter part of the 19th century and Thomas Henry Huxley coined "Darwinism".
Not only that when Creationists use "Darwinist" or "Darwinism" they do not use it as an insult. Evos still call themselves that. What would the insult be?
But anyway, this curmudgeon is a classic evoTARD- ignorant as hell and very proud of it.
By looking for news for the "Coppedge vs JPL" trial I have found a gold-mine in evoTARD ignorance. There is a gossip-hound- a very ignorant gossip-hound- that goes by the "sensuous curmudgeon". You want to see someone who doesn't let the facts get in the way of a good gossip-rant, that is the person to see.
Take a look at a recent blog:
Is Barack Obama a Creationist?
Even though this person is attacking President Obama, something I don't mind, it is doing so through sheer ignorance.
Neither the term "social darwinism" nor "Darwinism" nor "Darwinist" were invented by Creationists. "Social Darwinism arose in the latter part of the 19th century and Thomas Henry Huxley coined "Darwinism".
Not only that when Creationists use "Darwinist" or "Darwinism" they do not use it as an insult. Evos still call themselves that. What would the insult be?
But anyway, this curmudgeon is a classic evoTARD- ignorant as hell and very proud of it.
posted by Joe G @ 4:37 PM
7 Comments:
At 6:19 PM,
The Bicycling Guitarist said…
While I don't agree with all of the Sensuous Curmudgeon's political or social views, his blog is one of the best places on the internet to get accurate information on the "controversy" about evolution.
Whether or not you choose to accept it, ALL the evidence supports evolution and none falsifies it, while NO evidence supports a young earth creationist viewpoint and much falsifies that viewpoint.
The people who regularly comment on the Sensuous Curmudgeon's blog are very intelligent and witty. I read his blog regularly as much for the comments as for the articles, which are well written and accurate even if you don't think so.
At 10:46 PM,
Joe G said…
Thanks for the laugh- That blog doesn't contain anything that is accurate- it is mostly lies.
As for supporting "evolution"- nice equivocation. Neither ID nor YEC is anti-evolution as both accept "a change in allele frequency over time". And tehre isn't any evidence supporting the claim that natural selection is a designer mimic.
The sensuous curmudgeon is ignorant of science and refuses to understand what the opponents of materialsim say.
That blog is one place to go if one wants a skewed view from a deranged pyscho. Even if you don't think so...
At 9:46 AM,
themayan said…
Yes it is a laugh as the word evolution is a wildcard word (which as you rightly noted is not the issue). The real issue is the modern synthesis which infers more than just changes in allele frequency over time.
I have several citations from at least few evolutionist themselves who are honest enough to admit that the modern evolutionary synthesis is failed paradigm. Of course they still cling to prokaryote to man evolution, but again at least they admit the modern synthesis can no longer be considered a valid theoretical framework for evolutionary biology.
I was called dishonest by these fools at the Sensuous Curmudgeon and I was challenged to present these citations. And when I did, they did the usual and changed the goals post and or offered irrelevant straw man arguments and red herrings.
At 6:57 PM,
Anonymous said…
This Curmudgeon is very careful with what he allows on his site, I recently posted twice highlighting some very easy to spot flaws in his own posts, clearing showing that evolutionists use ideology and guesswork in their theories, he decided not to make public my posts. I then emailed him and asked for transparency, surely a man of his intelligence wants both sides of this story seen by the masses in the interest of justice? to this i received no reply.
It seems if you propose inline with his ideology you get air time, if you dare question him even with a position of reason you get ignored and deleted.
At 7:11 PM,
Joe G said…
The Curmudgeon is a he?
At 7:18 PM,
Anonymous said…
Based on the comments he/they leave his profile pic appears male
At 7:43 PM,
Joe G said…
I've seen women who look like that picture and the rantings remind me women I have known.
Post a Comment
<< Home