Retard's "Evidence" for Common Ancestry
EvoTards are such clueless pricks. It is entertaining watching them present "evidence" for their claims.
With universal common ancestry there isn't any way to test the claim objectively as there is way, way too much time involved. This allows evotards to weasel out of doing any science to support their position. However they will have us believe there is circumstantial evidence. Evidence, the say, that can only be explained via common ancestry-> which is just a question-begging fallacy.
For example I was just visited by an evotard that goes by "human ape". It wants to be an ape so badly it calls itself one. But that isn't the entertainemnt. On its blog it sez:
Human ape fetuses and whale fetuses are covered with hair which drops off before birth. The hair is a remnant of our ancient hairy ape ancestors and it's a remnant of whale ancestors who lived on land. This is the only possible scientific explanation.
Unfortunately the dumbass has absolutely no way of supporting its question-begging claim. Not only that the freaking ignorant punk doesn't understand that evidence for common ancestry is not evidence for any mechanism.
Why can't it be that the hair/ fur is just part of the developmental program for mammals? One basic/ common developmental program for mammals, with each getting its own required "personal" code that determines the final archetype.
So untestable question-begging plus the inability to think = evidence for a human ape.
On another note-
2012 will go down as the year in which the myth of 98.x% genetic similarity between chimp and humans is shattered, putting the actual % below 90%. And that may be too large of a difference to be accounted for via stochastic processes.