Intelligent Reasoning

Promoting, advancing and defending Intelligent Design via data, logic and Intelligent Reasoning and exposing the alleged theory of evolution as the nonsense it is. I also educate evotards about ID and the alleged theory of evolution one tard at a time and sometimes in groups

Thursday, July 28, 2011

Kevin R McCarthy, aka OgreMKV, LIes and Equivocates- Sez Evolution Makes Predictions

-
Kevin R McCarthy of Round Rock Texas chokes on reality:

This applies to evolution as well. Evolution is the system that makes predictions. If those predictions are observed, then evolution is supported. This has been shown to happen. Evolution makes predictions about everything from anti-biotic and pesticide resistance to effects of parasites and predators on populations. These observations have all matched the predictions made by evolutionary theory.

BWAAAAAHAAAAAAHAAAAAHAAAAHAAAAA- nice equivocation, moron.

The theory of evolution doesn't say anything about anti-biotic nor pesticide resistance.

The theory doesn't make any predictions based on the proposed mechanism of accumulations of genetic accidents.

Kevin R McCarthy of Round Rock Texas is a typical evotard loser.

19 Comments:

  • At 10:41 AM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    Tiktaalic - *Found*

     
  • At 11:18 AM, Blogger Joe G said…

    Except, according to Neil Shubin in "Your Inner Fish", Tiktaalik didn't fulfill any predictions.

    And it certainly isn't a prediction borne of accumulating genetic accidents.

    IOW another RichTard FAIL

     
  • At 4:49 PM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    No, they went on a picnic to Nunavut and found it by accident....

     
  • At 8:05 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    Again, according to Shubin, in his book "Your Inner Fish" he was looking in the wrong place and strata. What he found was not what he said he was looking for.

    I can't help it if you are too stupid/ biased to understand what shubin wrote.

     
  • At 8:44 PM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    Which is more likely, Shubin is incredibly lucky, or you don't understand what's going on?

    "I can't help it if you are too stupid/ biased to understand what shubin wrote."

    You've been corrected multiple times by multiple people on this. So I wonder who is "stupid/ biased"

     
  • At 8:52 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    Which is more likely- You are an ignorant son of a bitch or Shubin lied?

    RichTard:
    You've been corrected multiple times by multiple people on this.

    Except I have been correcting you and your mental midget minions.

    I can't help it if you are too stupid/ biased to understand what shubin wrote.

     
  • At 9:07 PM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    "Which is more likely- You are an ignorant son of a bitch or Shubin lied?"

     
  • At 9:09 PM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    "Which is more likely- You are an ignorant son of a bitch or Shubin lied?"

    So he lied before he found it! that's even less likely. Do you have any clue how expiditions are funded, or of his work before the find?

     
  • At 9:57 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    "Which is more likely- You are an ignorant son of a bitch or Shubin lied?"

    RichTard:
    So he lied...

    No, you are an ignorant son of a bitch.

     
  • At 10:32 PM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    "So he lied..."

    Now that's a quote mine. Well done! 10/10 ceationist!

     
  • At 8:31 AM, Blogger Joe G said…

    RichTard:
    Now that's a quote mine.

    In what way?

    But anway obviously you are ignorant as Shubin said he was looking for the transition which happened BEFORE tetrapods appeared. And Tiktaalik was found in strata after tetrapods appeared.

     
  • At 8:55 AM, Blogger Joe G said…

    And we are still waiting for evolutionism's predictions....

     
  • At 11:05 PM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    "so he lied.." suggests a position I hold.

    "So he lied before he found it! that's even less likely" shows I do not support that thesis and gives reason why.

    You are simply incapable of being honest, parking-lot-sock-puppet.

     
  • At 11:36 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    RichTard:
    "so he lied.." suggests a position I hold.

    That was one of the choices and the first words you used.

    RichTard:
    "So he lied before he found it! that's even less likely" shows I do not support that thesis and gives reason why.

    The "reason" is a red herring. I never said nor implied he lied before he found it was one of the choices.

    I was referrinbg to the book- as I said, asshole.

    You are simply too stupid to hold a discussion.

     
  • At 12:58 AM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    Joe caught quote-mining - in other news dog bites man.

    ID deserves you ;-)

     
  • At 8:18 AM, Blogger Joe G said…

    RichTard still lying and ignorant. In other news he eats shit and likes it.

     
  • At 1:25 PM, Blogger OM said…

    Joe,
    The theory of evolution doesn't say anything about anti-biotic nor pesticide resistance.

    And what does ID say about those things then?

     
  • At 6:07 PM, Blogger IntelligentAnimation said…

    Joe: The theory of evolution doesn't say anything about anti-biotic nor pesticide resistance.

    OM: And what does ID say about those things then?

    (My response): ID predicts intelligent genetics. If a miscrobe is in need of toxin resistence, it will get it. If it is not in need of it (the control group), it will not receive the genetic editing because genetic changes are need-based and not random. So far this always proves to be correct.

    A key part of the scientific method proof of ID is the control group. If genetic upgrades were random happenstance, then both petri dishes would be equally likely to show the genetic change. Toxin resistence will happen when needed and ONLY when needed.

    Like goosebumps when you are cold, sweat when you are hot and adrenaline when you need high performance, genetics will be edited when needed and only when needed.

    Now, where is the randomness Darwinism predicts?

     
  • At 6:56 PM, Blogger IntelligentAnimation said…

    Darwinism predicts random accident, so we should see multitudes of odd, messy useless appendages, forms and traits, even useless and odd instincts and thoughts. There should be several quadrillion of these for any one fluke that benefits anything. What we see is entirely the opposite, of course.

    Darwinism predicts gradualism, yet we observe hundreds of millions of years of stasis puncuated by sudden, enormous leaps of genomic ranges.

    Darwinism predicts selection will eliminate the less fit species. This has happened, but generally we see survival at all levels of the food chain from top to bottom and when we do see extinction it is almost always mass extinction having nothing to do with undesirable traits.

    Darwin made predictions. They just dont happen.

     

Post a Comment

<< Home