Independent Evidence for the Designer(s)
Another "argument" against Intelligent Design is the so-called "independent evidence for the designer(s)".
My answer to that is the evidence for design in biology is independent of the evidence for design in physics, which is independent from the evidence for design in cosmology, which is independent from the evidence for design in chemistry.
Yet that doesn't appear to be good enough.
These "critics" want some sort if evidence that the designer(s) exist.
So I tell them the design is that evidence.
The evidence for the designers of Stonehenge? Stonehenge.
IOW artifacts are that evidence.
Still not good enough.
They want to observe the designer(s) in action.
IOW those "critics" are not interested in science.
So I tell them that all they have to do is demonstrate that a designer is not required and they would have refuted the design inference.
But therein lies the problem- they cannot do that so they have to make up some "argument" that sounds good - to them I guess- and spew that all over the internet.