Equivocation and Evolution continued
Last October I posted a piece I called Equivocation and Evolution, to highlight the blatant misrepresentation that evolutionists use in order to deceive anyone reading their comments.
This equivocation has now filtered into mechanisms- so called evolutionary mechanisms.
1. As I have pointed out many times, evolution is not being debated.
2. Evolutionary mechanisms could very well be telic- ie designed, as in designed to evolve, with genetic accidents being a small part of the scenario. See Dr Spetner's Not By Chance
And finally, as has been pointed out at least several thousand times, not one of the evolutionary mechanisms, nor any combination, has been demonstrated to do anything except provide slight, oscillating variations in an existing population.
Note: Page 67 of “The Edge of Evolution” Dr Behe has Table 4.1- Varieties of DNA Mutations- substitution, deletion, insertion, inversion, gene duplication, genome duplication. IOW those evolutionary mechanisms are not ignored.
This equivocation has now filtered into mechanisms- so called evolutionary mechanisms.
1. As I have pointed out many times, evolution is not being debated.
2. Evolutionary mechanisms could very well be telic- ie designed, as in designed to evolve, with genetic accidents being a small part of the scenario. See Dr Spetner's Not By Chance
And finally, as has been pointed out at least several thousand times, not one of the evolutionary mechanisms, nor any combination, has been demonstrated to do anything except provide slight, oscillating variations in an existing population.
Note: Page 67 of “The Edge of Evolution” Dr Behe has Table 4.1- Varieties of DNA Mutations- substitution, deletion, insertion, inversion, gene duplication, genome duplication. IOW those evolutionary mechanisms are not ignored.
posted by Joe G @ 9:44 AM
5 Comments:
At 2:32 PM,
Unknown said…
Behe is the laughing stock of the scientific community. He makes a living trying to make the childish stupidity of magical creation look scientific.
Creationists are cowardly retards who are afraid to grow up and face facts.
Comment moderation has been enabled. All comments must be approved by the blog author.
Right, nobody likes censorship more than the creationist idiots. Fuck you asshole.
At 3:19 PM,
Joe G said…
Bob, you clueless pedophilic jerk-
Dr Behe is not a creationist- that is unless you redefine creation to include universal common descent.
Also there isn't any such thing as "the" scientific community.
Then there is the fact that those who do laugh at him are totally clueless fucks, like you, who think that happy accidents is a scientific explanation.
We exist you touchhole. And your position is nothing more than sheer dumb luck/ happy accidents. And that is why the majority of people on this planet know that you are full of shit.
At 3:24 PM,
Joe G said…
And BTW bob- it is YOUR position that relies on magic- as in RM-> Random Magic.
Just watch the History Channel and its reporting of the origin of life. The chemical constituents go behind a curtain and abbra-cadabra-> LIFE!
However they do bring up an interesting point->CHON->carbon, hydrogen, oxygen and nitrogen-> these are the atoms required. But wait, there wasn't any free oxygen on early Earth.
But anyway bob, are you "man" enough to admit your position is nothing more than sheer dumb luck/ happy accidents? Or are you still afraid to grow up?
At 3:43 AM,
Anonymous said…
"are you "man" enough to admit your position is nothing more than sheer dumb luck/ happy accidents?"
Yes, evolution is just like that. Are you "man" enough to admit that this is really what could have happened?
At 7:23 AM,
Joe G said…
"are you "man" enough to admit your position is nothing more than sheer dumb luck/ happy accidents?"
one
Yes, evolution is just like that.
The "evolution" you spew is.
Are you "man" enough to admit that this is really what could have happened?
What could have happened?
Post a Comment
<< Home