Intelligent Reasoning

Promoting, advancing and defending Intelligent Design via data, logic and Intelligent Reasoning and exposing the theory of evolution as the nonsense it is. I also educate evotards about ID and the theory of evolution one tard at a time and sometimes in groups

Friday, February 22, 2008

Evolutionary research? (HT to thorton)

Can anyone point to any labs, or published results that unambiguously provide evidence* for non-telic processes?

*That is evidence which demonstrates that non-telic processes can account for the origins of living organisms as well as all subsequent diversity.

9 Comments:

  • At 1:28 PM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    So you want a lab that shows abiogenesis and a complete and comprehensive guide to all the diversity of life?

    Hmmm.

    Is there a lab that shows the complete laws of Physics?

    Is there a lab that shows all of chemistry?

     
  • At 3:47 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    So you want a lab that shows abiogenesis and a complete and comprehensive guide to all the diversity of life?

    It could be many labs working on non-telic abiogenesis and many others working on different aspects of the diversity of living organisms.

    I did say labs, or published results.

    But thanks for proving that you cannot even comprehend a very simple post.

     
  • At 2:29 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    I only have two blog rules:

    1- Put up or shut up- meaning support your position.

    Trying to disparage ID via ignorance-driven rantings will not change the fact that you cannot support your position.

    2- Do not try to change the subject- stay on topic.

     
  • At 8:36 AM, Blogger Joe G said…

    It is amazing that people can be so stupid as to not understand the difference between singular and plural:

    Can anyone point to any labs, or published results that unambiguously provide evidence* for non-telic processes?

    labs- plural, meaning MORE THAN ONE

    published results- also plural, meaning MORE THAN ONE.

    Now I understand why these ignots cannot even support their position. They don't even understand English nevermind trying to understand science.

     
  • At 7:36 AM, Blogger Joe G said…

    Note to rishy and all other mentally challenged evolutionitwits:

    YOU don't get to tell me what I meant.

    YOU don't get to twist what I said into something you want.

    When I asked:

    Can anyone point to any labs, or published results that unambiguously provide evidence* for non-telic processes?

    It means EXACTLY that- labS or published resultS- plural on both- but I would settle for one, working on some aspect of confirming non-telic processes. That would be a start.

    However the reason I aksed for more than one (plural) is because I know that no one lab is going to be doing it all.

    Now TRY to focus on providing support for YOUR position.

    Arguing from ignorance and trying to tell me what I really meant, just further cements the fact that evolutionitwits are intellectual cowards.

    Ya see the ONLY way ID is going to go away is for you and your ilk to substantiate the claims made by your position.

     
  • At 7:57 AM, Blogger Joe G said…

    Say a teacher is reviewing math for a mid-term exam. The teacher writes an equation on the board and asks if the students recognize the equation.

    That teacher does NOT want to hear that only one student understands it. That teacher wants to hear that many, if not all, students understand it.

    Or say you were in an accident in which you lost 4 fingers on your left hand.

    The doctor asks how many fingers did you lose? You tell him 4.

    Or another example- say a squadron of airplanes took off from England to bomb Germany (WWII).

    The commander wants to know how many planes made it back from the trip.

    Do you think he is asking about one or more than one airplane?

    Or a car race- You ask how many cars started the race?

    Are you asking about one car or many cars?

    So when I ask:

    Can anyone point to any labs, or published results that unambiguously provide evidence* for non-telic processes?

    It means EXACTLY that- labS or published resultS- plural on both- but I would settle for one, working on some aspect of confirming non-telic processes. That would be a start.

    However the reason I aksed for more than one (plural) is because I know that no one lab is going to be doing it all.

    Now TRY to focus on providing support for YOUR position.

    Arguing from ignorance and trying to tell me what I really meant, just further cements the fact that evolutionitwits are intellectual cowards.

    Ya see the ONLY way ID is going to go away is for you and your ilk to substantiate the claims made by your position.

    The bottom line is if you do not want to follow the rules of the blog you don't get to post here.

    And if you are unwilling or unable to support your position then wallow in your intellectual cowardice until you evolve a spine that allows you to stand up and beat back ID with actual scientific data.

    IYour inorance-driven drivel will not refute ID.

     
  • At 9:41 AM, Blogger rishy said…

    This comment has been removed by the author.

     
  • At 12:22 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    rishy,

    Everyone already knows that you are an idiot.

    There's no need to announce it.

    Now stay on topic or go announce your stupidity on some other venue.

     
  • At 3:47 PM, Blogger rishy said…

    Nice work!

     

Post a Comment

<< Home