The Criterion for the Materialistic anti-ID position
In my many years of discussing evolutionism, Creation and ID, I have asked on many occassions "What is the criteria for determining the obvious "apparent" design observed in living organisms and the universe?"
IOW I am interested in what is the data that supports the materialistic anti-ID position.
For all my asking I have never received a straight answer. And with all the negative attacks the materialists hurl at Creation and ID, it became obvious that there is only one criterion:
Flat out refuse to accept an intelligent agency was responsible no matter what data is presented.
So there you have it. The materialistic anti-ID position is intellectually bankrupt and as unobjective as one can get.
IOW I am interested in what is the data that supports the materialistic anti-ID position.
For all my asking I have never received a straight answer. And with all the negative attacks the materialists hurl at Creation and ID, it became obvious that there is only one criterion:
Flat out refuse to accept an intelligent agency was responsible no matter what data is presented.
So there you have it. The materialistic anti-ID position is intellectually bankrupt and as unobjective as one can get.
1 Comments:
At 11:02 AM, CJYman said…
Completely true!!!
I've been wondering myself, for some time now, what the inference is to information processing systems organizing themselves by random accidental chance processes.
Post a Comment
<< Home