Intelligent Reasoning

Promoting, advancing and defending Intelligent Design via data, logic and Intelligent Reasoning and exposing the alleged theory of evolution as the nonsense it is. I also educate evotards about ID and the alleged theory of evolution one tard at a time and sometimes in groups

Tuesday, October 27, 2020

Peaceful Science is Lying Again


Peaceful Science has become a bastion for lying liars and bullshit spewing cowards. A new thread pertaining to the Dover trial just popped up. It's full of lies. Like this one:

 Fifteen years ago, a public drama unfolded in Dover, Pennsylvania. In 2005, a school board tried to mandate teaching Intelligent Design (ID) in high school science class.

LIAR! The only thing mandated was that the teacher was to read ONE statement to the class. No one was going to teach ID. The people who say that are pathetic and lying like little bitches.

They go on to spew:

In December 2005, the Dover Trial came to an end, and could not have been worse for ID.

Wrong again, dumbass. ID was unaffected by the trial. Dr. Behe responded to the decision and proves the judge was clueless . Dr Behe concluded:

The Court’s reasoning in section E-4 is premised on: a cramped view of science; the conflation of intelligent design with creationism; an incapacity to distinguish the implications of a theory from the theory itself; a failure to differentiate evolution from Darwinism; and strawman arguments against ID. The Court has accepted the most tendentious and shopworn excuses for Darwinism with great charity and impatiently dismissed evidence-based arguments for design.

All of that is regrettable, but in the end does not impact the realities of biology, which are not amenable to adjudication. On the day after the judge’s opinion, December 21, 2005, as before, the cell is run by amazingly complex, functional machinery that in any other context would immediately be recognized as designed. On December 21, 2005, as before, there are no non-design explanations for the molecular machinery of life, only wishful speculations and Just-So stories. 

To this ay there still isn't any evidentiary or scientific support for evolution by means of blind and mindless processes. The concept is untestable.



Post a Comment

<< Home