Multiple Different Measures for TEMPERATURE!
-
Jeard, the ignorant twerp from the UK via Wisconsin, actually thinks that because there are multiple differing measures for specified complexity that means there is some problem with the concept. However all one needs to do is look at temperature measures to see that multiple differing measurement techniques for one thing- temperature- does not make each method invalid.
Where and how do these fuckers dream up their ignorant spewage?
11 Comments:
At 12:22 PM, Rich Hughes said…
http://ww2010.atmos.uiuc.edu/guides/maps/gifs/temp.scales.gif
Can you provide the ID equivalent? Of course not.
At 2:34 PM, Joe G said…
ID has more than unguided evolution ever will. And we know that has you all hot and bothered.
At 2:56 PM, Rich Hughes said…
BWAHAHAHHAAHHAHA. What a pathetic dodge.
At 4:48 PM, Joe G said…
LoL! The truth hurts, again...
At 5:13 PM, Rich Hughes said…
The truth that you dodged.
At 5:41 PM, Joe G said…
Richie, cupcake, ID does not need the equivalent. Dodging your strawman is a good thing.
The point stands and ID has more than unguided evolution.
At 5:55 PM, Rich Hughes said…
Sorry Chubs, but if they're the same you can map them (as demonstrated). When you say "ID doesn't have to" invariable you mean "ID can't", which is most of the time.
Lets see we have
Bits, Fits and fishing real diagrams. How do they map?
At 5:59 PM, Joe G said…
Yes, Richie, we can map them to design or not. And the bits and fits are a one-to-one match. I even explained that in my blog about it.
At 6:01 PM, Joe G said…
Measuring CSI in Biology- a Repost
At 10:06 PM, Unknown said…
Yes, it has a mythical vindictive little prick as a malignant dictator.
At 10:13 PM, Unknown said…
Joe, ID's brightest lights are Gordon (fishing reel) Mullings, Denyse (i wouldnt know journalism if it bit me in the ass) O'Leary, Barry (ban all dissenting views) Arrington and V. J.(god did it) Torly. Not much of a cheering section.
Post a Comment
<< Home