Intelligent Reasoning

Promoting, advancing and defending Intelligent Design via data, logic and Intelligent Reasoning and exposing the alleged theory of evolution as the nonsense it is. I also educate evotards about ID and the alleged theory of evolution one tard at a time and sometimes in groups

Friday, June 27, 2014

Richie Hughes and the Lying EvoTARDs of The Septic Zone

I haven't looked in on TSZ for a while and decided to take a look. All I read was the same ole lying claptrap- Richie creme-cake Hughes saying that CSI hasn't been investigated even though I have presented peer-review papers that have investigated and calculated it*. Patrick the assface May saying that irreducible complexity has been refuted even though there isn't any evidence in peer-review that supports that claim. And fatass Joe Felsenstein misrepresenting CSI by saying the definition includes what it is supposed to demonstrate (because gpuccio's English isn't very good and Joe cannot understand what Dembski writes).

All of this when all it would take to falsify ID is to actually do the work and demonstrate purely materialistic processes can actually do what materialism requires of them. But they don't even know where to start.

See for yourselves: That pesky evoTARD ignorance  (not the original title of the thread but it is a better fit).

Still entertaining and still pathetic.

*Measuring CSI in Biology

Saturday, June 21, 2014

Climate Change Hysteria- Jon Stewart Needs to Buy a Vowel

Jon Stewart ragging on the GOP because of their global warming, I mean climate change, skepticism. The members of the GOP who call it a hoax are referring to the alarmist nonsense about the catastrophic effects of CO2. So get a grip.

And Jon, if one actually looks at the NOAA Global temps from 1880-now, we are only .74 degrees C above some arbitrary norm. And if you look from 1977 until  2014 there isn't any indication of any thermal runaway. And guess what? CO2 has been increasingly pumped into the atmosphere.

The climate changes, that is just what happens on this planet. Science has told us that and yet people are alarmed when the climate changes. Strange.

Friday, June 06, 2014

Jerry Coyne is a Cowardly Cry-Baby who has his Panties in Knot

This is too funny. A High School principal in Lebanon, MO mentioned the word "God" several times during his speech at his High School's graduation ceremony. He did NOT endorse Christianity. He did not endorse Islam. He did not endorse any religion.

Most of the "God" references were of historical note- "In God We Trust" is on our currency. The Declaration of Independence talks of a Creator. And in a moment of silence the principal said he asked God to avail Himself in every possible way. He made his moment of silence public.

No endorsement of religion there.

However Jerry Coyne sez the principal violated the First* amendment. We will add the Constitution to the long list of things Jerry Coyne is ignorant of.

One lawyer said the following:

"Unless he says Lebanon High school officially recognizes Christianity or something to that extent, then that would be illegal, but that's not what occurred in this instance," said Wampler.  "So like it or not, is up to each person.  We can't have state or city churches either, but this does not establish a church."

Coyne is too stupid to grasp that simple fact.

*edited from 2nd- confused Jerry's latest rantings on the Constitution.

Thursday, June 05, 2014

Zachriel is Ignorant of the Common Descent Concept

This is too funny, an evolutionist choking on the concept of common descent. See it for yourselfs-

Zachriel posted:

A family tree is not common descent, that is, unless you have a habit of marrying your cousins. In most cases, mating is between families, not within families. 
So only people who marry their cousins can have descendants?  Really?

Earlier Zachriel posted:
If we group each organism with all of its descendants (forming clades), then yes, we would have a set pattern such that each subset is contained within its superset. That's due to the tree-like structure. The obvious deduction is that the traits of the leaves, given descent with modification, would naturally group together such that each subset is contained within a superset. The set patterns would closely match. 
So I said that a family tree is a clade (by Zach's definition) yet it doesn't form a nested hierarchy. That is when Zachriel sed that shit about a family tree not being common descent.

Common Descent in a nutshell:

Parents have offspring that are slightly modified versions of themselves. These offspring then have offspring that are slightly modified versions of them. And so on until the offspring no longer resemble the original parents, and it keeps going and possibly diverging and converging.

That is how the tree pattern is formed.

But how stupid does an evolutionist have to be to not understand that? Or is it that Zachriel sees that it has stepped on its own little brain and will say anything to distract from that fact?

Can't lose the nested hierarchy debate to us so Zachriel goes into full denial mode.

Tuesday, June 03, 2014

The Clueless Left on Gun Control

What a bunch of lying assholes the left has become. They see gun violence and they immediately want to take away the guns. Well assholes guns killed just over 10,000 people in the USA last year while abortions took 1.2 MILLION babies. So shut the fuck up as you are obviously just a bunch of clueless assholes.

Monday, June 02, 2014

What is Parsimony

Wikipedia says:
Occam's razor (also written as Ockham's razor and in Latin lex parsimoniae) is a principle of parsimony, economy, or succinctness used in problem-solving devised by William of Ockham (c. 1287–1347). It states that among competing hypotheses, the one with the fewest assumptions should be selected. Other, more complicated solutions may ultimately prove correct, but—in the absence of certainty—the fewer assumptions that are made, the better.

Understanding Evolution says:
The parsimony principle is basic to all science and tells us to choose the simplest scientific explanation that fits the evidence.  

OK competing hypotheses and scientific explanations. Well materialism and its bastard child evolutionism don't have scientific hypotheses nor do they posit scientific explanations- no, innumerable  improbable coincidences are neither hypotheses nor scientific.

Also innumerable improbable coincidences is by far the more complicated solution as it is akin to continually winning lotteries which is very improbable and therefor very, very complicated for an explanation. So complicated no one even knows what the explanation is.

That is why one coordinated design is by far more parsimonious than innumerable improbable coincidences.

Sunday, June 01, 2014

If Science Looks for Parsimonious Answers... HT RichTARD Hughes

If science looks for parsimonious answers then materialism and its bastard child evolutionism, lose. They lose because their "answers" are innumerable improbable coincidences, and that is as far from parsimonious as it gets. And it even goes against common sense.

One coordinated design is by far more parsimonious than innumerable improbable coincidences. But I doubt Richie will ever admit that because he is too stupid to understand it.