Intelligent Reasoning

Promoting, advancing and defending Intelligent Design via data, logic and Intelligent Reasoning and exposing the alleged theory of evolution as the nonsense it is. I also educate evotards about ID and the alleged theory of evolution one tard at a time and sometimes in groups

Friday, March 05, 2021

The Genetic Code is Evidence for Intelligent Design

 -

The genetic code is evidence for Intelligent Design based on the following facts:

1- The genetic code involves a coded information processing system

2- There isn't any evidence that nature can produce coded information processing systems

3- There isn't even a way to test the claim that nature can produce coded information systems

4- There is ONE and ONLY one known cause for producing coded information processing systems and that is via intelligent agency volition

Peer-review is devoid of any science showing that nature can produce coded information processing systems. The fact that the genetic code is still called a "frozen accident" tells us there still isn't any way to test the claim that nature can do it. And peer-review and textbooks are absent such a test

EvoTARDs may disagree but they will NEVER be able to refute any of those 4 facts. entropy will be its normal lying self and post total lying bullshit about what I posted. But it will NEVER present any science to refute what I posted.

And morons, if it could not have been humans that produced the genetic code then we infer it was some other intelligent agency. Nature doesn't magically get an ability just cuz humans were not around.

posted by Joe G @ 10:15 AM  

2 Comments:

  • At 6:02 AM, Blogger scd said…

    i have an interesting argument about the existence of god and evolution: say that we will see a self replicating robot ( lets say even with dna) on a far planet. do we need to conclude design or a natural process in this case? remember that according to evolution if its made from organic components and have a self replicating system we need to conclude a natural process because it has living traits. but we know that even a self replicating robot is evidence for design. therefore a penguin for instance need design too

     

  • At 9:00 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    We don't even self-replicate. Does the robot split in half and then both halves for a new whole? Or is there a little assembly line inside that takes the materials it consumes and duplicates the parts in use by the parent? So we would have to study it before reaching any conclusion.

    Evos may be able to show there are processes capable of producing some of the basic molecules. But they don't even seem to be able to get biologically relevant replicators from that. They talk of a RNA world but there isn't any evidence for one.

     

Post a Comment

<< Home