Entropy is another Ignorant EVOTARD- Natural Selection

 -

Natural selection INCLUDES the variation. But dumbass entropy says:

Selection is not the same as the source of the variation over which selection happens. 

“Natural selection is therefore a result of three processes, as first described by Darwin: Variation Inheritance Fecundity which together result in non-random, unequal survival and reproduction of individuals, which results in changes in the phenotypes present in populations of organisms over time.”- Allan McNeil, professor @ Cornell

“Natural selection is the simple result of variation, differential reproduction, and heredity—it is mindless and mechanistic.” UC Berkeley

“Natural selection is the result of differences in survival and reproduction among individuals of a population that vary in one or more heritable traits.” Page 11 “Biology: Concepts and Applications” Starr fifth edition

Got that, asshole? Natural selection is the RESULT of THREE processes, one of which is variation.

The dumbass spews:

Mutations can happen for a number of reasons: failures in replication, exposure to different kinds of radiation, and each of these might have biases. It’s because of potential biases that I’d prefer not to call them chance events.

Holy shit! No one cares what YOU say, asshole. Mutations are said to be accidents, errors and mistakes. They are NOT planned. Look at how many times Darwin used the word "chance" to describe the variation.

So what does the asshole do? It picks on the Mayr quote:

The first step in selection, the production of genetic variation, is almost exclusively a chance phenomenon except that the nature of the changes at a given locus is strongly constrained. Chance plays an important role even at the second step, the process of elimination of the less fit individuals. Chance may be particularly important in the haphazard survival during periods of mass extinction.- Ernst Mayr “What Evolution Is”

Because of the words "almost" and "except" it thinks somehow ruins my argument. Yet if it could read for comprehension it would know I am right and it is wrong. The almost and except pertain to the constraints. They are still all chance events in that they are accidents, errors and mistakes, meaning they are not planned and do not happen via telic processes- according to evos.

Darwin conjured natural selection to be a designer mimic. The appearance of design without a designer. Without intent. Without a goal. If the mutations occur via telic [processes then it isn't natural selection as it violates those terms.

The very telling part is entropy NEVER provided any evidence or a reference that what I said was incorrect. All it did was prove it is an ignorant ass.

Then it actually tried to harp on me for clarifying a post that evoTARDs misread!

Again, I will go with what the experts say over some internet asshole who can't even form a coherent argument. Anyone can read Darwin's "On the Origin of Species..." and see how he describes the variation as chance events. And you can see how Darwin used NS to replace the designer. Mutations as telic events wouldn't do that.

Entropy is so stupid it doesn't even understand the word "atelic". 

Radioactivity does NOT decide which bases are going to be mutated. It is still a chance event that the mutations occurred as they did.

The definition of chance that is relevant is "do something by accident or without design"

entropy will be too stupid to understand that.