Neil Rickert- Proudly Ignorant

-
Neil should just give up. Now Neil spews:

Evolution is not a claim about abstract sequences of symbols. That is to say, it is not a claim about information.

What? Evolution needs to account for the codes in biology, ie abstract sequences of symbols. DNA codons are the symbols for the amino acids they represent.

There are books about it: Information Theory and Evolution

And articles: Evolution of biological information

Neil spews:

That the ID folk continue to construe evolution as a claim about information, only demonstrates the weakness of their program.

It is a claim about information you ignorant ass. Crick is the one who defined information with respect to biology. It is what needs to be accounted for.

Neil Rickert, ignorant ass and proud of it.

Evolution is obviously a claim about information. The only people who doubt that are willfully ignorant asswipes- like Neil

In "Steps Towards Life" Manfred Eigen wrote:

Our task is to find an algorithm, a natural law that leads to the origin of information.

Whoops

Then there's "Information and the Origin of Life" by Bernd-Olaf Kuppers.