Joshua Swamidass is Confused
-
In the "Is evolution speculation thread" Joshua said:
Jerry Coyne still endorses NDE. The way evolution is taught in colleges endorses NDE. All those two did was add to the concept, not falsify it.
Natural selection and evolution: material, blind, mindless, and purposeless- THAT is NDE in its modern form, ie with the addition of Haldane and Kimura.
The point is the majority in science accept NDE. So I don't know what Joshua is talking about and no one there is going to challenge him so we may never find out what he is talking about.
Joshua mistakenly also sez: https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/hunts-2007-critique-of-axe/1245/133
Dr Venter would tend to disagree
In the "Is evolution speculation thread" Joshua said:
Um, I do not accept neo-Darwinism. No one in science does. Neo-Darwinism was falsified in the 1960s with Haldane and Kimura.What? How did Haldane and Kimura falsify NDE? He never says- because they didn't.
Jerry Coyne still endorses NDE. The way evolution is taught in colleges endorses NDE. All those two did was add to the concept, not falsify it.
Natural selection and evolution: material, blind, mindless, and purposeless- THAT is NDE in its modern form, ie with the addition of Haldane and Kimura.
The point is the majority in science accept NDE. So I don't know what Joshua is talking about and no one there is going to challenge him so we may never find out what he is talking about.
Joshua mistakenly also sez: https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/hunts-2007-critique-of-axe/1245/133
There is zero evidence conscious intelligence can produce anything like the complexity of DNA.
Dr Venter would tend to disagree
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home