Intelligent Reasoning

Promoting, advancing and defending Intelligent Design via data, logic and Intelligent Reasoning and exposing the alleged theory of evolution as the nonsense it is. I also educate evotards about ID and the alleged theory of evolution one tard at a time and sometimes in groups

Friday, February 17, 2017

Earth to Patrick May, et al.- You Forgot Something

-
Patrick May posted:
Alan Fox, Neil Rickert, and I, acting as admins of The Skeptical Zone, have unanimously concluded that Frankie‚Äôs behavior over the past several weeks constitutes spam. 
That's it, no evidence, just their say-so. The reason there wasn't any evidence is because if provided in context it would show that they post spam. And by they I mean the moderators and regular evo-babblers.

The sheer ignorance and stupidity of "The Christian omni-God doesn't exist because there is too much evil and suffering", is just one example. Why is it sheer ignorance and stupidity? We don't know the plan, we don't know the rules, and said God is not beholden to our limiting definitions and limited understanding.

Alan Fox went off of the rails recently just because he was ignorant of what SETI is looking for. Because of his ignorance Alan challenged my claim they are searching for an artificial signal. This was to rebut the claim that only man-made things qualified as artificial. When dealing with an ignoramus of that magnitude many facts and inferences would look like spam.

Patrick May is another story. He is proud to be willfully ignorant of what ID says and what evolutionism* has. And he thinks that his ignorance is a position of power.

Neil Rickert firmly refuses to give any clue as to what he accepts and why. He just loves to falsely accuse me of doing something.

And Allan Miller is just totally clueless- sorry Allan couldn't resist. This guy denies the fact that the genetic code is a real code. He should be taken with all the seriousness of a YEC. He also ignorantly sez that men just want to "win". If by winning he means that the truth comes out and we finally get to openly figure out how we got here, then I am all for it. I don't care about points. I care about people supporting their claims or shutting the fuck up about it.

As Michael Shermer said if you want to say that living organisms arose via blind and mindless processes (physics and chemistry) then you first must assume that premise is false until demonstrated otherwise. And if you want to say that vision systems arose via natural selection, drift, neutral construction or any other blind and mindless process, then once again you have to assume that it is false until demonstrated otherwise. Evolutionists do not do that. They just say it, assume it and call it a day.

And yet I am accused of posting spam for pointing all of that out.

Guys, please hold your breath while waiting for me to send Patrick an email asking for reinstatement.

10 Comments:

  • At 1:55 PM, Blogger William Spearshake said…

    "That's it, no evidence, just their say-so."

    The evidence is there for all to see. None of your comments have been removed.

     
  • At 2:32 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    And? The evidence that you are a low-life lying loser is there for all to see. The evidence that you are a spammer extraordinaire is also there for all to see.

    And thus we see the real problem with "The Skeptical Zone". Thank you wee willie. How's Cornelius treating your comments lately? And why do you think that is? I know why.

    So thank you for proving my point, again.

     
  • At 2:47 PM, Blogger Rich Hughes said…

    Thanks for the comment count!

     
  • At 2:52 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    LoL! Right on cue we get no context and spammer extraordinaire, Richie ReTardo.

    Clueless until the end.

     
  • At 5:09 PM, Blogger William Spearshake said…

    "How's Cornelius treating your comments lately? And why do you think that is? I know why."

    He lets all of them through. What's your point.

     
  • At 6:42 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    "He lets all of them through"

    Liar

     
  • At 10:31 AM, Blogger William Spearshake said…

    Ask him. Or are you banned there as well?

     
  • At 10:33 AM, Blogger Joe G said…

    How do you know that I haven't already? Why do you think that I know you are lying about it...

     
  • At 11:11 AM, Blogger William Spearshake said…

    I have posted hundreds of comments on his blog. To the best of my knowledge, he has only blocked two or three. And they included direct links to papers that refuted his anti-evolution proof of the day. He is funny that way. You can insult him and call him names and he will let your posts stand. But if you provide actual hard evidence that shows that he is misrepresenting the facts, he will sometimes block the comment.

    How many sites are you now banned on? I am only banned on one.



     
  • At 11:48 AM, Blogger Joe G said…

    To the best of my knowledge, he has only blocked two or three

    You don't have any knowledge and you sure as hell cannot produce any peer-reviewed papers tat support evolution by means of blind and mindless processes so I am sure you are lying about links to papers that refute Dr Hunter. You are just too stupid to understand the science and the debate

    I am not banned from any sites that matter. And you have never posted anything that matters- just a coincidence I'm sure

     

Post a Comment

<< Home