Piotr Gasbag (Gasiorowski)- Douchebag
-
Earth to Piotr- you have proven you don't know anything about nested hierarchies. I have referenced support my claims. If you want to discuss it then come here. If not then shut up. You have already eaten it once so I would understand why you would shy away.
Earth to Piotr- you have proven you don't know anything about nested hierarchies. I have referenced support my claims. If you want to discuss it then come here. If not then shut up. You have already eaten it once so I would understand why you would shy away.
posted by Joe G @ 5:26 PM
39 Comments:
At 8:28 PM,
Rich Hughes said…
Meh, he's not interested. If you can't get some hits from UD despite all your cheerleading, it must be bad. I'm paraphrasing.
At 8:49 PM,
Joe G said…
Meh, he's a bullshit coward. And I have gotten hits from posters on UD.
Piotr has nothing to say about nested hierarchies. He just agrees with anyone who disagrees with me and ID.
And despite your misunderstanding, I don't cheer, I defend and lead. OTOH all you do is cheer because you sure as hell can't defend and you can only lead to bullshit.
At 4:31 AM,
Rich Hughes said…
So you're a leader in the ID movement?
At 5:51 AM,
Joe G said…
Intelligent Design Evolution is my lead, cupcake.
At 1:44 PM,
Rich Hughes said…
"Intelligent Design Evolution is my lead"
WOW. Congratulations!
What have you achieved so far?
At 2:18 PM,
Joe G said…
Getting the idea out. That is a start. OTOH all you can do is sling shit at people that actually have ideas. You can't support you position. You don't even understand science.
You are just a pathetic little-minded fool.
At 2:28 PM,
Rich Hughes said…
So no actual research / lab time or anything science based?
At 2:39 PM,
Joe G said…
Not for you. And obviously not for unguided evolution.
All you have is some false confidence that future research will somehow rescue you.
At 2:43 PM,
Rich Hughes said…
"Not for you" = "Not at all"
"All you have is some false confidence that future research will somehow rescue you." ... "Those questions are for future research programs to answer." ;)
At 2:54 PM,
Joe G said…
Exactly Richie- yours doesn't have any research at all. Everything is for the future that will never come.
Nice own goal, again.
At 3:11 PM,
Rich Hughes said…
Uh huh, Joe.
So, how's your "getting the message out" leadership going?
Some good Op-Eds? You writing on ENV? Speaking engagements?
At 3:31 PM,
Joe G said…
Uh huh, cupcake. Thank you for demonstrating your amazing refutation techniques.
At 3:37 PM,
Rich Hughes said…
Confirmed: No leadership ;)
At 4:18 PM,
Joe G said…
Devastating refutation.
At 4:24 PM,
Rich Hughes said…
Zero substance to refute.
At 4:27 PM,
Joe G said…
Yes the cupcake of zero substance has spoken.
At 4:41 PM,
Rich Hughes said…
Look everyone! Joe is 'leading'!
At 5:17 PM,
Joe G said…
Look everyone! Richie is a pimple on the ass of progress!!11!!!1!!!!1!
At 5:44 PM,
Rich Hughes said…
Less moaning about me, dear leader, more leadership on 'IDE'
At 6:02 PM,
Joe G said…
So you are happy being a pimple on the ass of progress. Figures.
At 6:05 PM,
Rich Hughes said…
Your opinion is meaningless, dear leader. Get publishing / speaking.
At 6:07 PM,
Joe G said…
Everything you have said is meaningless and proves that you are nothing but a pimple on the ass of progress.
Well done
At 6:10 PM,
Rich Hughes said…
No Joe, that's just more unsupported Joeberish waiting for 'future scientists'. Let's focus on IDE - what's the next step?
At 6:16 PM,
Joe G said…
No, that is well supported by all of your posts. And you are the one waiting for future scientists, moron. You don't even know your place.
Too funny, cupcake.
At 6:18 PM,
Rich Hughes said…
*cough* "Those questions are for future research programs to answer." ;)
At 9:20 PM,
Joe G said…
That's evolutionism in a nutshell.
Questions that are asked once the design inference is made are obviously for future research. You morons ask what research projects ID produces, we tell you and you have your usual evoTARDgasms.
You couldn't be any more of an ignorant limp dick if you tried, cupcake. Nicely done.
At 10:24 PM,
Rich Hughes said…
Why are you attacking 'evolutionism', Joe? I thought you were a leader? Positive case for IDE?
At 5:55 AM,
Joe G said…
See, we knew that you were ignorant of science. Thank you for continually proving it.
Richie cupcake Hughes, proudly ignorant of science since birth.
How many times does it have to be explained that science MANDATES all design inferences must first eliminate necessity and chance, which means ID MUST eliminate evolutionism FIRST?
As I said: You couldn't be any more of an ignorant limp dick if you tried, cupcake. Nicely done.
At 1:54 PM,
Rich Hughes said…
Oh that's not science, Joe. That's ID Joeberish. Lead on! Write some op eds. Why aren't you posting on UD? Even Dipshit WJM gets to do that!
At 3:47 PM,
Joe G said…
You have no idea what science is nor what it entails, cupcake.
You couldn't be any more of an ignorant limp dick if you tried, cupcake. Nicely done.
At 4:02 PM,
Rich Hughes said…
Get leading! Come on leader.
At 6:22 PM,
Joe G said…
Get educated, cheerleader. Richie leads the cheering section...
At 8:33 PM,
Rich Hughes said…
It's no wonder ID isn't going anywhere! ;)
At 8:36 PM,
Joe G said…
ID isn't going anywhere because you are scientifically illiterate?
How does that work, exactly?
And BTW it appears I am leading the charge against evoTARD ignorance about nested hierarchies. One asshole loser owes me $10,000.
At 12:56 AM,
Rich Hughes said…
You should put funds in ecsrow and have a third party decide. Oh wait, you don't have $10k and you're wrong.
So what are the big IDE advances?
At 6:04 AM,
Joe G said…
LoL! As if a third party needs to decide- you are an absolute fucking loser.
I have $10,000 and I also have support for my claim. OTOH you are still an ignorant asshole.
Nice job, puke breath.
Notice how Richie FAILed to provide any support for its claim that I am wrong about nested hierarchies. That is all evoTARDs can do- baldly spew their ignorance as if it means something.
At 6:23 AM,
Joe G said…
One big IDE advance is showing that unguided evolution is incapable of producing the diversity of life observed.
At 9:51 AM,
Rich Hughes said…
So still no positive arguments.
At 9:59 AM,
Joe G said…
Still an ignorant dick, eh Richie.
Strange that IDists have presented many positive arguments for ID. You just choke on them because they all also contain an eliminative element. You choke on that because you are ignorant of science and a pathological liar.
RichTARD Hughes is not even wrong, again.
Post a Comment
<< Home