Intelligent Reasoning

Promoting, advancing and defending Intelligent Design via data, logic and Intelligent Reasoning and exposing the alleged theory of evolution as the nonsense it is. I also educate evotards about ID and the alleged theory of evolution one tard at a time and sometimes in groups

Saturday, April 11, 2015

"It Looks Designed" is a Valid Scientific Criteria

-
Thanks to Jerad "it looks designed" is a scientific criteria and ID is scientific. This is because Jerad thinks that because mitochondria and chloroplasts look like they coulda been bacteria that means they were and endosymbiosis is true.

Thanks Jerad

posted by Joe G @ 11:55 AM  

10 Comments:

  • At 1:45 AM, Blogger Unknown said…

    This is because Jerad thinks that because mitochondria and chloroplasts look like they coulda been bacteria that means they were and endosymbiosis is true.

    Show us a peer-reviewed research paper where someone made that argument.

    Found your programming yet? Figured out how it is encoded and stored? Have you discerned how it affects development?

    Are you now ready to pick an algorithm and show us how its result is consistent with some aspect of intelligent design evolution?

    Has any ID supporter figured out how long it took for human beings to develop?

     

  • At 1:44 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    That is the argument, moron. That is the only argument.

    Obviously you enjoy being a drooling moron.

     

  • At 3:12 PM, Blogger Unknown said…

    That is the argument, moron. That is the only argument.

    Obviously you enjoy being a drooling moron.

    It's not my fault that you can't quite come to terms with hundreds of research papers over decades building up the reasons and the rationales for what you choose to assume is just a WAG.

    Meanwhile . . .

    Have you found your programming yet?

    Have you figured out how that programming is encoded and stored?

    Have you discerned how it influences development?

    Can you know pick an algorithm and show that it comes up with a result that is consistent with intelligent design evolution?

    Have you found someone, anyone in the ID camp who can begin to address the question of how long it took for humans to develop?

    Since you've determined that design has 'occurred' have you figure out when? Are you even working on that?

    Can you begin to have a guess how design was implemented?

    Can you point to some physical evidence of labs or living quarters or some indication that there was some infrastructure implementing design?

    These are NOT theological questions. Do you have any answers to any of these questions?

     

  • At 3:38 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    YOU can't come to grips with the research, Jerad.

    Have you found your programming yet?

    Found plenty of evidence for its existence. And I am happy with the fact that you don't have any alternative explanations for that evidence.

    Have you figured out how that programming is encoded and stored?

    Nope but someone else may. An ID scientific research program is born.

    That's one more than unguided evolution!

    These are NOT theological questions.

    No, they are great for starting research programs after ID is accepted. Thank you.

    However they don't have anything to do with ID

    Meanwhile it still remains tat ID exists in part do to the complete FAILURE of your position to answer anything.

    Thanks again.

     

  • At 4:21 PM, Blogger Unknown said…

    YOU can't come to grips with the research, Jerad.

    And yet my vies are in accordance with a vast majority of biologists.

    Found plenty of evidence for its existence. And I am happy with the fact that you don't have any alternative explanations for that evidence.

    But you haven't found the programming yet.

    Nope but someone else may. An ID scientific research program is born.

    I agree. I think someone should be doing some research along those lines.

    No, they are great for starting research programs after ID is accepted. Thank you.

    Start now, get some results. I've always suggested that was the ID community needs is some research and results.

    Meanwhile it still remains tat ID exists in part do to the complete FAILURE of your position to answer anything.

    IF ID has anything to it then it can't just depend on the failure of another paradigm. It must stand on its own.

    Go out, do the work, find the results, get them published. That's the way to go forward.

     

  • At 4:38 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    And yet my vies are in accordance with a vast majority of biologists.

    It isn't in line with the evidence. No one cares what biologists say or believe. People care what the science demonstrates. That is all tat matters.

    Found plenty of evidence for its existence. And I am happy with the fact that you don't have any alternative explanations for that evidence.

    But you haven't found the programming yet.

    I have more than you do.

    IF ID has anything to it then it can't just depend on the failure of another paradigm.

    Jerad, you are a fucking moron. Science MANDATES that necessity and chance be eliminated first.

    It must stand on its own.

    Yours doesn't.

     

  • At 1:18 AM, Blogger Unknown said…

    It isn't in line with the evidence. No one cares what biologists say or believe. People care what the science demonstrates. That is all tat matters.

    No one cares what biologists say or believe?

    What's the point in trying to discuss things with you? You have science blinders on. If something doesn't agree with your view then you say it's not even science.

    Your personal position is unfalsifiable because you ignore anything you disagree with.

     

  • At 9:14 AM, Blogger Joe G said…

    Jerad, Thank you for admitting that you do not understand science. You are just an ignorant asshole.

    Good luck with that.

     

  • At 5:49 PM, Blogger Unknown said…

    Hi Joe. How do you explain the fact that mitochondria have different DNA than everything else in the body? We seem to be able to have a remarkably diverse type of cells and function with one set of DNA. Yet we need a different set for mitochondria?

     

  • At 6:24 PM, Blogger Joe G said…

    How do you explain the fact that mitochondria have different DNA than everything else in the body?

    What does that mean? A-T; G-C is the same.

     

Post a Comment

<< Home