KeithS- Spewer Extaordinare
-
In an evo-world where just saying anything means something, keiths sez:
What utter bullshit.
1- We love actual studies as they have supported us each and every time
2- We NEVER denied that darwinian evolution can work, given the right scenario
3- Neither Lenski nor Thornton's experiments demonstrate anything that challenges baraminology, nevermind challenging ID. As far as Lenski knows his was the result of built-in responses to environmental cues and Thornton, his latest has one part being substituted for another part. IOW nothing either one of them has accomplished supports blind watchmaker evolution. And they sure as hell don't support universal common ancestry.
keiths is just another willfully ignorant evoTARD- pathetic to the end...
In an evo-world where just saying anything means something, keiths sez:
Yes. That’s why IDers are so fearful of actual studies of actual fitness landscapes.
They have already conceded that Darwinian evolution can work, given the right fitness landscape.
Their only hope is to show that real fitness landscapes don’t have the necessary characteristics.
Studies like Lenski’s and Thornton’s show that this is a vain hope. And it’s only going to get worse for the IDers.
What utter bullshit.
1- We love actual studies as they have supported us each and every time
2- We NEVER denied that darwinian evolution can work, given the right scenario
3- Neither Lenski nor Thornton's experiments demonstrate anything that challenges baraminology, nevermind challenging ID. As far as Lenski knows his was the result of built-in responses to environmental cues and Thornton, his latest has one part being substituted for another part. IOW nothing either one of them has accomplished supports blind watchmaker evolution. And they sure as hell don't support universal common ancestry.
keiths is just another willfully ignorant evoTARD- pathetic to the end...
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home